FAIL XML-Validator-Schema-1.09 amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release

2008-01-31 Thread srezic
This distribution has been tested as part of the cpan-testers effort to test as many new uploads to CPAN as possible. See http://testers.cpan.org/ Please cc any replies to cpan-testers@perl.org to keep other test volunteers informed and to prevent any duplicate effort. -- Dear Sam Tregar,

Re: FAIL XML-Validator-Schema-1.09 amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release

2008-01-31 Thread Sam Tregar
On Jan 31, 2008 4:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: t/02yaml# No tests run! dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) You, like your compatriots, have a broken XML::SAX. I just uploaded v1.10with a check for this problem in Makefile.PL. Hopefully that will address

Re: FAIL XML-Validator-Schema-1.09 amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release

2008-01-31 Thread Sam Tregar
On 01 Feb 2008 00:41:49 +0100, Slaven Rezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably it's easier to have some check in the 02yaml.t test and skip it if necessary. You guys are hilarious! It's as though the tests themselves had no meaning at all - all you want is 100% passed, and it's no big deal

Re: FAIL XML-Validator-Schema-1.09 amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release

2008-01-31 Thread Slaven Rezic
Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Jan 31, 2008 4:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: t/02yaml# No tests run! dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) You, like your compatriots, have a broken XML::SAX. I just uploaded v1.10with a check for this

Re: FAIL XML-Validator-Schema-1.09 amd64-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release

2008-01-31 Thread Slaven Rezic
Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 01 Feb 2008 00:41:49 +0100, Slaven Rezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably it's easier to have some check in the 02yaml.t test and skip it if necessary. You guys are hilarious! It's as though the tests themselves had no meaning at all - all