Re: more thinking on getting RC status into reports

2010-03-26 Thread Serguei Trouchelle
David Golden wrote: The header will also be preserved through file save/load, but I have not yet done corresponding work on the CT2.0 Test::Reporter::Transport::Metabase. (I'm out of tuits for tonight) It's possible that all 5.12.0 reports on CT2.0 will need to be purged. Just update them to

more thinking on getting RC status into reports

2010-03-25 Thread David Golden
We could also add another X- header. X-Test-Reporter-Perl: 5.12.0 RC0 Assuming Barbie updates CPAN::Testers::Common::Article to prefer that over other things, we could at least keep the stats database clean. It doesn't help how reports are displayed, but maybe perl version can be added to

Re: more thinking on getting RC status into reports

2010-03-25 Thread Barbie
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:55:20PM -0400, David Golden wrote: We could also add another X- header. X-Test-Reporter-Perl: 5.12.0 RC0 Assuming Barbie updates CPAN::Testers::Common::Article to prefer that over other things, we could at least keep the stats database clean. It doesn't help

Re: more thinking on getting RC status into reports

2010-03-25 Thread David Golden
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote: I'm happy to go with either solution. Though the summary line version probably is the more correct solution, the X-header would be the easier to parse. OK. It turned out to be a lot more work than I originally