On 7 May 2018 at 14:27, Pat Riva wrote:
> Propose to modify the scope note of E74 Group so that it clearly
> corresponds to LRM-E8 Collective Agent. To do this any groups of people not
> having agency, such as national, religious, cultural, ethnic groups, must
> be excluded from the scope of E74.
?Each individual in a democratic nation can choose to vote (or not).
Then the elected government (an LRM-E8 Collective agent) takes actions and is
responsible, not all those people holding that citizenship.
Pat Riva
Associate University Librarian, Collection Services
Concordia University
V
It's the citizenry as a whole which decides who that government should be.
It's not the decision of an individual elector, but of the citizenry as a
group.
On 9 May 2018 at 16:40, Pat Riva wrote:
> Each individual in a democratic nation can choose to vote (or not).
>
> Then the elected governme
But nations are much more than democratic nation-states. What about small
nations steered by consensus, clan based nations, national with a significant
number of political decisions based on referendum? What about nations/countries
where voting is obligatory and it is a criminal offence not to v
Hello
The issue ws discussed in the Cologne meeting. The changes in yellow do not
fullfil the rquirement
"Propose to modify the scope note of E74 Group so that it clearly corresponds
to LRM-E8 Collective Agent. To do this any groups of people not having agency,
such as national, religious, cu
Issue notes here:
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-358-crmsoc-and-scope-of-crm-modules
I am continuing with one of the sub-issues which says:
"About simplifying the template for the description of the family
models: During the discussion about describing the new family model
CRMsoc, the sig dec
During the last meeting we agreed to review the way that the
documentation about CRM base and its extensions is managed. This is
probably as part of issue 358, but there have been messages in the list
about this issue (e.g. by Rob, but I can't find the reference)
Francesco, George and I discussed
In version 6.2.2 there is a paragraph towards the end of the scope note
for E94 Space Primitive which looks like it has been copied and pasted
from an earlier version of P168. It refers to a "property" which does
not make sense. So I propose that it changes from:
"Note that it is possible for a p
In version 6.2 the scope note for "P8 took place on or within" says:
"P8 took place on or within (witnessed) is a shortcut of the more fully
developed path from ‘E4 Period’ through ‘P7 took place at,’ ‘E53 Place’,
‘P156 occupies’, to ‘E18 Physical Thing’."
I think it should use the reverse label
