Some additional comments:
First some tentative answers to the three first questions and then a longer
comment on the forth:
1) which E2 is not an E4, even in a broad sense?
Condition states
2) which E94 (relevant, and not just purely abstract) is not also an E4?
A physical object
A couple of comments from me:
>> 1) which E2 is not an E4, even in a broad sense?
I think the question here are whether "E3 Condition State" is the same
as "E4 Period" and if "P5 and P9 consists of" are similar transitive
properties. From a conservation point of view I was never comfortable
with
Dear Franco,
you find me in full agreement with your vision of things.
All the best
Francesco
Le 21.03.19 à 10:52, Franco Niccolucci a écrit :
Dear Francesco
I agree with your analysis. My comment last night aimed at showing in
Dan’s case the inconsistencies you explain in your message by
Dear Francesco
I agree with your analysis. My comment last night aimed at showing in Dan’s
case the inconsistencies you explain in your message by a reductio ad
absurdum.
My questions are:
1) which E2 is not an E4, even in a broad sense?
2) which E94 (relevant, and not just purely abstract) is
Dear Dan, Franco, all,
in a nutshell:
Period – E4
P4 has time-span E52 Time-Span
P7 took place at E53 Place
Spacetime Volume – E92
P160 has temporal projection E52 Time-Span
P161 has spatial projection E53 Place
Period – E4 (phenomenal) Pxx has projection in Spacetime Volume – E92
(Dan, resist, the cavalry is arriving, do you hear the trumpets? )
Sorry, that’s not convincing.
E4 Period is a subclass of E92 Spacetime Volume, so every E4 is also an
E92. There may theoretically be some E92 that are not E4, i.e. abstract
subsets of R4 (sorry my email app does not allow
