Dear all,
In some SIG, I was charged with finding out how to give the citation for
the examples given in E10 from the Getty Provenance Index.
This is the preferred Citation style:
Getty Provenance Index®,
https://piprod.getty.edu/starweb/pi/servlet.starweb?path=pi/pi.web,
accessed -MM-DD.
B
Dear all,
In preparation for the discussion of non-human actors as related to use
cases arising in Linked.Art (inter alia), Rob and I have sketched some
ideas back and forth to try to find a monotonic was to add the agency of
animals in the first instance into CRM (proceeding in an empirical botto
Dear George, Robert,
This makes generally sense to me as a discussion starting point.
However, I‘d like to remind you that our methodology requires first a
community practice of doing documentation about such things, and second
domain experts for concepts that are not our primary knowledge.
...I'd like to add that behavioral studies with birds and mammals may be
a reasonable scope, but, experts need to speak I think!
Best,
Martin
On 10/11/2021 6:50 PM, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear George, Robert,
This makes generally sense to me as a discussion starting point.
However,
Could we clarify what sort of expert we're looking for to move the
discussion forward? In particular, natural history museums seem to be at
the critical intersection between CIDOC and the activities of animals. I
can represent the sorts of documentary evidence from that side, and happy
to reach out
Dear Robert,
Having collaborated with natural history museum colleagues for some
years and designed a research infrastructure for biodiversity in Greece,
I understand that they normally do not describe the actions of an
individual in a way that information integration on the base of the
indiv
Hi Martin,
I think Rob listed in the introduction to the issue the use cases of
documentation of individual action of animals.
It would seem that natural scientists don't only study species but also
individuals.
Here's a smattering of pieces culled from casual reading in the past few
weeks with
Just to remark that the library world discussed non-human actors for many years
(in the literal sense of actor as in the dogs that portrayed Lassie in the TV
series, or that portrayed Sykes and Paddy from Midsomer Murders, somehow it is
always cute dogs that are brought up in the discussion).
T
Hi Pat,
While that is certainly true from a model-theoretic perspective, in
practice authorities simply create Persons for them which is, in my
opinion, even worse because there is a demonstrated need which the modeling
is intentionally preventing.
For example in the Library of Congress:
Real ani
Hi Rob,
Looking at the dates on Lassie and Misha, I see that they were created during
the phase when people were trying this under an unwise modification to RDA, and
not been revised since. This would no longer be valid under the latest RDA. And
no one has bothered to propose MARC coding specifi
10 matches
Mail list logo
