Re: [Crm-sig] Scope note/range clarification - E80, P112

Isn't "diminished" just a label, rather than a value statement? I don't think something needs to be complete for a part to be removed (I can break a twig off the branch, which I previously broke off the tree). I read it as "was made smaller by" in that some part was removed. I agree that Part Remov

Re: [Crm-sig] Scope note/range clarification - E80, P112

Yes this is a logical position. I guess the way I have been reading it is that the object that is diminished was indeed intentionally made by a human and therefore it *can* be diminished. If it is any thing then who judges if it is complete and has been diminished? There is no agency on its ori

Re: [Crm-sig] Scope note/range clarification - E80, P112

Good spotting! I agree with Thanasis that there is any issue, but I think that the range is wrong for P112, which I would argue should also be E18. For example, I find a tree and break off a branch. The tree is not a Human-Made Thing, it's an E20 Biological Object. Or I break a piece of obsidian (

Re: [Crm-sig] Scope note/range clarification - E80, P112

Hm, yes, this is confusing. We might need a new issue to update the scope note. I think the correct class is E24 as it seems that E80 Part Removal does not cover cases such as cutting a stalactite off in a cave. Thanasis On 29/11/2021 15:41, Erin Canning via Crm-sig wrote: Hello, I am hoping

[Crm-sig] Scope note/range clarification - E80, P112

Hello, I am hoping you might be able to help me with a small confusion - The scope note for E80_Part_Removal states that "This class comprises the activities that result in an instance of E18 Physical Thing being decreased by the rem

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Great news!! I vote YES. A. > Il giorno 27 nov 2021, alle ore 21:21, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig > ha scritto: > > Dear All, > > It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace Museum in > Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership. > > I have received the following request fr

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Yes On Mon, Nov 29th, 2021 at 1:13 PM, Marta Acierno via Crm-sig wrote: > > Yes > > Il giorno lun 29 nov 2021 alle ore 11:42 George Bruseker via Crm-sig < > crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > > ha scritto: > > >> yes >> >> >> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:37 PM Donatella Fiorani via Crm-sig < >

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Yes Il giorno lun 29 nov 2021 alle ore 11:42 George Bruseker via Crm-sig < crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> ha scritto: > yes > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:37 PM Donatella Fiorani via Crm-sig < > crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote: > >> Yes >> >> Il giorno sab 27 nov 2021 alle ore 21:29 Martin Doerr via Crm-sig <

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

yes On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:37 PM Donatella Fiorani via Crm-sig < crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote: > Yes > > Il giorno sab 27 nov 2021 alle ore 21:29 Martin Doerr via Crm-sig < > crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> ha scritto: > >> Dear All, >> >> It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Pal

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Yes Il giorno sab 27 nov 2021 alle ore 21:29 Martin Doerr via Crm-sig < crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> ha scritto: > Dear All, > > It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace > Museum in Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership. > > I have received the following request from the Muse

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Yes. Øyvind > Am 27.11.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig > : > > Dear All, > > It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace Museum in > Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership. > > I have received the following request from the Museum: > > "The Palace Muse