Hi Thanasi,
Yes that's true. Good reminder. That might be a solution but then we would
need the particular property for expressing that two events are causally
connected. I avoided to put it in the last email so as not to stir up to
many semantic teapots. But obviously to have the general
Hi George, all,
As part of Linked Conservation Data (and with the help of Carlo, Martin
and Steve) we proposed the idea of Typed Properties which derive from
current CRM properties and always have E55 Type as range.
E.g. "bears feature" → "bears feature of type" so that one can describe
the
better phrasing, 'about a particular thing that is known categorically'
Eg Sales Record about 'Sale Event'
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:53 PM George Bruseker
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Recently work is on-going on a new property 'represents thing of type'
> which is distinct from 'represents'
Dear all,
Recently work is on-going on a new property 'represents thing of type'
which is distinct from 'represents' (again that particular vs categorical
distinction).
https://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-476-pxx-represents-entity-of-type
I am confronted with cases of an information object being
Hi all,
I have situations in which I have events where the data curators describe
events for which they have generic knowledge of the outcome: sold,
completed, incomplete, this sort of thing. So there is knowledge but it is
not knowledge of the particular next event but of a general kind of
