Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

YES Øyvind > Am 20.03.2022 um 21:32 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 > in February. > > In the document for Issue 360: HW: F28 Expression Creation >

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Common Policy / Method for Implementing the .1 Properties of Base and Extensions in RDF

I think this is a good idea! Martin On 3/24/2022 1:23 PM, Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig wrote: Dear George, all, The new version of PC classes file (for CRMbase version 7.1.1) has been already produced (as discussed in the last meeting) and will be soon available through the crm website (see i

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Common Policy / Method for Implementing the .1 Properties of Base and Extensions in RDF

Dear George, all, The new version of PC classes file (for CRMbase version 7.1.1) has been already produced (as discussed in the last meeting) and will be soon available through the crm website (see issue 567 ). Thinking of it again: Sin

[Crm-sig] New Issue: Common Policy / Method for Implementing the .1 Properties of Base and Extensions in RDF

Dear all, Subsequent to another thread I started here I am proposing that there be a conversation about having a standard policy and method for creating, documenting and making available the .1 properties for base and its extensions in the RDF serialization. At present to my knowledge the PC class