Dear All,
I think we need to reconsider this. The examples somehow make clear that
the triggering event to be finished by the time the triggered event
starts is incidental and not essential the the intended meaning. I now
support an interpretation that the triggering event is essentially of
*
Indeed and the original questions raised were about the phrase in the
introduction "The association of the two events is based on their
temporal proximity, i.e. the triggering event ends when the triggered
event starts." I think the examples mentioned in the scope note indicate
a temporal relat
Dear All,
Is this analysis of "part addition z has added y to x" correct?
start of z:
x and y already exist
y is not part of x
end of z:
x and y still exist
y is part of x
together:
z is temporally (properly) within the "existence" condition states of x and y
y has a "part of x" conditio