Hi,
I thought that may be the reason. In our models the properties are
bidirectional so from a purely logical point of view there is no no domain and
range. All properties simply connect classes. Still it is a good and clear
principle, so keep it as it is.
My vote is YES.
Best,
We were following the rule that a property declared in an extension must have
its domain in the extension when reading in the normal direction. The range can
be in CRMbase. Is it true this is the rule?
The inverse does seem more natural in the examples but maybe not in the way the
property
YES!
Martin
On 7/13/2023 1:20 AM, Pat Riva via Crm-sig wrote:
Hello all,
I am calling for an e-vote relating to LRMoo. Please vote on the list
by *July 26th*.
Background: At the end of SIG meeting #55 in May 2023 in Heraklion,
the LRMoo WG presented a sketch of a new approach to R10 after
Question about the direction:
R10 is member of (has member):
Domain: F1 Work
Range: E28 Conceptual Object
In all the examples the inverse is used. What is the motivation for the
direction in the declaration?
Best,
Christian-Emil
From: Crm-sig on behalf of
Yes,
Pierre
Le 29 juil. 2023 à 23:17:15, Pat Riva via Crm-sig a
écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> Not having had any votes during this vacation period, I'm *extending the
> deadline to Sunday August 20*. That is the beginning of the IFLA congress
> where the BCM Review Group meeting will be held and we
YES.
Out of curiosity: what does
Subproperty of: Outside of CIDOC CRM scope
for R81 mean?
Øyvind
> Am 30.07.2023 um 03:40 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig :
>
> Hello all,
>
> During the SIG meeting #56 in May 2023 in Heraklion, the LRMoo WG presented a
> new approach to performances (see here
YES
Øyvind
> Am 29.07.2023 um 23:17 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig :
>
> Hello all,
>
> Not having had any votes during this vacation period, I'm extending the
> deadline to Sunday August 20. That is the beginning of the IFLA congress
> where the BCM Review Group meeting will be held and we
