Re: [Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Quantifiers of P140,P141,P177

2024-03-19 Thread Martin Doerr via Crm-sig
Dear Christian-Emil, I agree with all you write. The quantification should be (1,1:0,n) for all subproperties you have listed. Best, Martin On 3/19/2024 8:52 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote: Dear Martin, I have read this issue a little late. I have no problem with your

Re: [Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Quantifiers of P140,P141,P177

2024-03-19 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig
Dear Martin, I have read this issue a little late. I have no problem with your argumentation. There may be a side effect. P35: Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n) For all x,y we have P37(x,y) ⇒ P141(x,y) Since the quantification of P35 is (1,n:0,n), then it may exist