Dear All,
Let me add two remarks:
Information lives from relations, not classes. To talk about
arrangements to sell a physical object and a conceptual object, does not
create a requirement for a class combining the two. You just sell two
things of different nature, in one provision. You may
Dear All,
If the auction lot is just a list, then we could model it as a list,
which refers to the things. A plan of what to sell. If it is sold piece
by piece to different clients, it is not clear why it should be regarded
as one thing at all.
If it has an identifier for this particular
What Martin describes was my understanding as well at the Linked.Art
meeting. In response to Rob's notes:
I think that indeed we have the "lot (object)" which is a physical thing
that is sold and "lot (record)" which is a document talking about the
"lot (object)". Writing about a physical
Dear Florian, All,
It is not clear to me why people do not want to use E18 for Aggregates
that are not intended to grow over time in the sense of a collection.
The time, how long they are together, does not play a role. The question
is only, if they are well defined and identified for some
persons that identify as female, without
implying a Group that is necessarily able of taking coherent action.
Rob
From: Crm-sig on behalf of Florian Kräutli
Date: Monday, October 21, 2019 at 3:46 AM
To: George Bruseker
Cc: crm-sig
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Curated Holding vs Physical Thing
Dear George,
This is indeed a problem I too have encountered often. The scope note of E78
suggests a rather narrow definition of a collection, but there is no
satisfactory alternative for modelling the type of collections you describe.
However, instead of introducing another class and then
Dear all,
At the recent Linked.art event, the Linked.art group was attempting to
model information related to auctions. It happens that during auctions,
lots (collections or sets of things) are created with the intention that
things will be sold together. Ie they are aggregates. In facing the
