Hi,
The Linked Pasts gazetteer group (part of Pelagios) yesterday expressed
an interest in mapping their Linked Places ontology to the CIDOC CRM.
What is the current state of the art for doing this sort of mapping?
The last time I was involved in such an exercise, the result ended up in
a not-ver
Dear Richard,
Notwithstanding a more authoritative response, we have developed the
ontome.net application precisely for coping with this kind of issues –
and providing in the end a RDF (XML-OWL) export of the mapping.
So, if you're interested, we can exchange on this.
Best wishes
Francesco
Dear Francesco, Richard,
I am a bit confused. Even though people wrongly call a gazetteer a
"place name ontology", it has nothing to do with ontology, because it is
a collection of particulars. A place is not a class.
I understand that the mapping exercise is a data transformation from
Pelag
on behalf of Martin Doerr via
Crm-sig
Sent: 09 September 2021 18:50
To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Linked Places mapping
Dear Francesco, Richard,
I am a bit confused. Even though people wrongly call a gazetteer a "place name
ontology", it has nothing to do wit
in my opinion, an interesting task and could help a lot.
> Best,
> Christian-Emil
>
>
> From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr via
> Crm-sig
> Sent: 09 September 2021 18:50
> To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Linked Places mapping
>
> Dear France
my opinion, an interesting
>> task and could help a lot.
>> Best,
>> Christian-Emil
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Crm-sig > <mailto:crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr>> on behalf of Martin Doerr via
>> Crm-sig mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
On 09/09/2021 17:50, Martin Doerr via Crm-sig wrote:
> Dear Francesco, Richard,
>
> I am a bit confused. Even though people wrongly call a gazetteer a
> "place name ontology", it has nothing to do with ontology, because it
> is a collection of particulars. A place is not a class.
>
> I understand t
