Dear All,
I think we need to reconsider this. The examples somehow make clear that
the triggering event to be finished by the time the triggered event
starts is incidental and not essential the the intended meaning. I now
support an interpretation that the triggering event is essentially of
Indeed and the original questions raised were about the phrase in the
introduction "The association of the two events is based on their
temporal proximity, i.e. the triggering event ends when the triggered
event starts." I think the examples mentioned in the scope note indicate
a temporal
Dear All,
O13 "triggers" in CRMsci requires the triggering event to be finished by the
time the triggered event starts. In the example of rainfall causing a landslide
in the scope note, it would mean that continuing rainfall has to be split up
into the part before the landslide and after the
