Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] IT Support for Strategic and Entreprise Members

2012-06-12 Thread Denis Roy
Hi Ed, Some answers flow inline: On 06/12/2012 04:10 AM, Ed Willink wrote: Hi I'm puzzled on a couple of counts regarding the recent 36 hour Hudson downtime at RC4 +0. Firstly, David Williams has an IBM email, so I presume he works for IBM, who I presume are strategic members, so when

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] IT Support for Strategic and Entreprise Members

2012-06-12 Thread Benjamin Cabé
Hello, Hudson is a tier-3 service, meaning webmasters invest their best effort in keeping it alive. It is listed in the tier-2 section on the Wiki page [1], is this a mistake then? Benjamin. [1]. http://wiki.eclipse.org/IT_SLA#Tier_2__-_Best_Effort

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] IT Support for Strategic and Entreprise Members

2012-06-12 Thread Denis Roy
On 06/12/2012 09:38 AM, Benjamin Cabé wrote: Hello, Hudson is a tier-3 service, meaning webmasters invest their best effort in keeping it alive. It is listed in the tier-2 section on the Wiki page [1], is this a mistake then? Apologies, it was a typo in my email. The SLA doc is correct.

[cross-project-issues-dev] Input on platform rebuild decision

2012-06-12 Thread John Arthorne
The Platform is considering an RC4 rebuild to pick up a new version of ECF. We are far past our contribution deadline at this point, so can you please chime in on this bug if this affects your project either way. The last thing we want to do is further disrupt the release train after the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] IT Support for Strategic and Entreprise Members

2012-06-12 Thread Jesse McConnell
I'll just point out the obvious confusing detail on that page, In Services Covered: Tier 2 is _called_ Best Effort yet in Service Availability: Tier 3 is actually Best Effort, while Tier 2 is 99% cheers, jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] IT Support for Strategic and Entreprise Members

2012-06-12 Thread Denis Roy
Thanks for pointing that out. I've done some edits to (hopefully) clarify things. Denis On 06/12/2012 12:00 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: I'll just point out the obvious confusing detail on that page, In Services Covered: Tier 2 is _called_ Best Effort yet in Service Availability: Tier

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Target audience of Juno repo

2012-06-12 Thread Oberhuber, Martin
Good point, Is there a quick HOWTO for adding a project's listing to marketplace ? Martin From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:42 PM To: 'Cross project issues'

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Target audience of Juno repo

2012-06-12 Thread Konstantin Komissarchik
1. http://marketplace.eclipse.org/ 2. Click on Add Content link 3. The rest should be self explanatory. J From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 11:16 AM To:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Target audience of Juno repo

2012-06-12 Thread Konstantin Komissarchik
I would recommend adding/updating the entry right when you make the downloads visible. There could be a delay before the entry is visible as there is an approval process involved, but it should still be visible some time on the release day. - Konstantin From:

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Target audience of Juno repo

2012-06-12 Thread Nathan Gervais
To be clear there is only an approval process to publish the listing(s) the first time. Any further updates are instantaneous. Also sending an email to marketplace-supp...@eclipse.org will get myself or Chris' attention rather quickly should you need something approved. Nathan Gervais Web

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] IT Support for Strategic and Entreprise Members

2012-06-12 Thread Jesse McConnell
yep, that is much improved, thanks! jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote: Thanks for pointing that out.  I've done some edits to (hopefully) clarify things. Denis On 06/12/2012 12:00 PM, Jesse

[cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno!

2012-06-12 Thread David M Williams
24 hours left! I appreciate everyone keeping the build green and making progress on the sim rel reports [1], though there are a few serious issues left there. Just wanted to remind everyone that after RC4 (which ends tomorrow, Wednesday, at 5 PM, unless someone asks for a few extra hours)

[cross-project-issues-dev] WindowBuilder is going to be late

2012-06-12 Thread Mark Russell
Due to a late issue I am doing a rebuild of WindowBuilder and should have it out in about two hours. -- Mark R Russell (724) 473-3140 Software Engineer in Test Google Pittsburgh ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

[cross-project-issues-dev] Is hudson-slave1 down?

2012-06-12 Thread Michael Golubev
Hello, Last half a hour I am getting seemingly endless stream of builds, all failing like the one at [1] with: hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed: /opt/users/hudsonbuild/workspace/tycho-gmp.gmf.tooling at hudson.remoting.Channel@18931e52:hudson-slave1 Is it just me or some

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Managing repositories referenced by simrel .b3aggrcon files

2012-06-12 Thread David M Williams
It is important to make sure the b3aggrcon files point to something that allows a quick last minute rebuild to be performed, if needed ... but beyond that, there's no specific rule or guideline about how or when to do it ... I think it depends on each project's (or release engineer's?)