Up until an hour ago, we were all set with having our final build
for 4.2.1
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops4/M20120912-1200/
and 3.8.1 would have been
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/M20120905-1000/
But, some last minute discussion deemed the two bugs belo
Can you clarify what you mean? So far there are still 10 projects in Juno
that have not enabled their contribution for Kepler and hence not on
"staging". [1] Perhaps you meant to look on .../releases/maintenance?
If you do mean something more about Juno SR1, I got the impression from
this cha
We may have pushed her too far... :_)
On 09/14/2012 12:11 PM, Eike Stepper wrote:
Now I could access the console page:
BUILD FAILED
[...]
Process leaked file descriptors. See
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Spawning+processes+from+build
for more information
That's th
Is PDT missing the boat on Juno SR1 ?
I don’t see PDT on http://download.eclipse.org/releases/staging .
See also https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=383977 which is still in
NEW state (reported 30-Jun).
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools,
Now I could access the console page:
BUILD FAILED
[...]
Process leaked file descriptors. See http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Spawning+processes+from+build for more
information
That's the first time I see this on Hudson.
Cheers
/Eike
http://www.esc-net.de
http:/
Ha! someone is getting snarky now :)
Of course I was just about to reply that it certainly wasn't jetty's fault :P
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Denis Roy wrote:
> That's probably Jetty's fault :P
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09/14/2012 11:18 AM, Eike Stepp
That's probably Jetty's fault :P
On 09/14/2012 11:18 AM, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi Denis,
with all the continous effort you're investing I hate to say it, but
the other minute one of my builds died with something like "Problem
spawning process":
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-cd
Hi Denis,
with all the continous effort you're investing I hate to say it, but the other minute one of my builds died with
something like "Problem spawning process": https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-cdo-integration/2336/console
Currently I can't look up the exact message anymore becau
A disk has failed on the server hosting the m2m, maven, orion, orionhub
and torrents vservers.
Although service remains available for those sites, disk performance is
degraded. As the disks are not hot-swappable, I'll be taking the host
server offline at 1:30pm this afternoon (in 2.5 hours)
I've been quite pleased with Hudson's performance and stability recently.
It's not perfect, but it is much, much better than it was a few months
ago. I think the software update and the good work Matt has done with
the slaves has made a noticeable improvement.
As I type this, 25 build jobs a
For me it seems to work, at least my Graphiti maintenance build I just started
appears to be fine:
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/me/my-views/view/Graphiti/job/emf-graphiti-maintenance/37/
Michael
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
