Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Denis Roy
On 2022-02-17 10:46, Wim Jongman wrote: Mickael's point is valid, nonetheless. We are trying to focus our energies on services that add value to the community. If it is decided by a large percentage of the community that an Eclipse-branded blog platform is what adds value,

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Christopher Guindon
Thanks, Wim, I am curious to see if others in the community are interested in this feature. We should also discuss if this feature actually adds value. We can use this bug to track that interest and discuss some details such as who should be responsible for moderation on the issue. I will share

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
Thanks, I filed https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/it/websites/blogs.eclipse.org/-/issues/5 On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 4:54 PM Christopher Guindon < chris.guin...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote: > I created blogs.eclipse.org a while back in order to create a copy of > blog posts written by

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Christopher Guindon
I created blogs.eclipse.org a while back in order to create a copy of blog posts written by departed foundation staff. Over time, this platform organically evolved into a blogging platform that our staff is now using to create new blog posts. I am definitely open to entertaining the idea of

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
> Mickael's point is valid, nonetheless. We are trying to focus our energies > on services that add value to the community. If it is decided by a large > percentage of the community that an Eclipse-branded blog platform is what > adds value, we'll certainly entertain it. > I was just looking at

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
> > I was 1 year in the board of EF as committer representative. It was > moreover a bad year (they happen) with bad consequences for some EF > services and employees. I've learned there that always asking EF for more > is not really in the best interest of the community and that the community >

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
> > > Doesn't gitlab have a "gitlab-pages" feature similar to "github-pages" ? > > Any old static site generating blog software can generate tag-specific > feeds... I use Pelican for this which is dead simple: Write some > markdown, run make, git commit, git push to github/gitlab-pages. I > don't

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Denis Roy
So if the blog platform introduce a reduction of quality about the CI or GitHub integration, adding a few more hours of delays for each answer, then it's definitely not something profitable to the community. If the blog platform has very low SLA, so low that its issues are

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Mickael Istria
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:49 PM Wim Jongman wrote: > Dude, lighten up. You talk about the EF webmasters and the infra like they > are about to die. > I was 1 year in the board of EF as committer representative. It was moreover a bad year (they happen) with bad consequences for some EF services

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Mat Booth
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 14:57, Wim Jongman wrote: > > > >> >> >> I use a content management tool called Hugo that allows me to tag my >> articles. Hugo will generate an RSS feed for each tag and I share the RSS >> feed with the tag "eclipse" on PlanetEclipse: >>

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
> > I use a content management tool called Hugo that allows me to tag my > articles. Hugo will generate an RSS feed for each tag and I share the RSS > feed with the tag "eclipse" on PlanetEclipse: > https://www.chrisguindon.com/tags/eclipse/index.xml > That looks great. Is that something that the

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
> > > > Define "our" ;) > https://blogs.eclipse.org > The issue with asking Foundation for more services is that -with limited > manpower- it reduces the quality of services on existing services. > I think we should leave that decision to the foundation. So if the blog platform introduce a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Christopher Guindon
> > I think it would be nice if we could make blogs directly on an Eclipse > blogging server. I sometimes make blogs on my company website that get > promoted to Eclipse Planet but some blogs are so far detached from my > companies business that I don't want to post them there. I use a content

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Mickael Istria
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 12:15 PM Wim Jongman wrote: > Having our own blogging server would make sure that useful blogs are > archived forever, and it is organized and searchable from one place. > Define "our" ;) The issue with asking Foundation for more services is that -with limited manpower-

[cross-project-issues-dev] Eclipse Blogging

2022-02-17 Thread Wim Jongman
Hi, I think it would be nice if we could make blogs directly on an Eclipse blogging server. I sometimes make blogs on my company website that get promoted to Eclipse Planet but some blogs are so far detached from my companies business that I don't want to post them there. I had made blogs on