I don't know what webmasters did to fix Hudson, but much appreciated)
I thought you fixed it yourself by killing a job that was constantly
checking cgit:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=363891#c18
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailin
There were a couple of late submissions, so what I am hoping is the last
run is in progress now. It will be complete approximately 9 PM (Eastern)
which I assume won't impact EPP builds too much.
(And, given the way Hudson was working, for a while today, I am happy we
are able to complete today
M@IBMUS
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 05/08/2013 03:57 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
A PTP build is running now.
After a quick sniff test (optimistically) I will move it to our M7 are
-|
|05/08/2013 03:18 PM
|
>---|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>-------------------|
|Re: [cross-
ould agree its not worth
> re-spinning M7 just for that.
>
>
>
>
> From:Ahmed Wafa
> To:Cross project issues ,
> Date: 05/08/2013 03:04 PM
> Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
> Sent by:cross-project-issues-de
er,
is more descriptive and modern looking, IMHO. I would agree its not worth
re-spinning M7 just for that.
From: Ahmed Wafa
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 05/08/2013 03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:cross-project-i
Hi,
I had a question. After I looked at the reports, I noticed that one of our
plugins was missing the "about.html" file and that it didn't have
"Eclipse.org" as vendor. I added them now but I need to run the build and
deploy and I can't cause there's something wrong with Hudson. Is it
possible tha
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David M Williams
wrote:
> 2) I've not seen a green build for EPP for M7 and in talking to Markus,
> he's not had time to work on it yet, getting RAP contribution ready ... so,
> in other words ... I sure hope no one (such as my Platform builds, broke
> the EPP build
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David M Williams <
>> david_willi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a reminder that today (Wednesday) is the last day to make
>>> contributions towards
<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org>
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Tsvetkov,
Krum
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 15:54
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Hi,
I made a change to upda
-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Tsvetkov,
Krum
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2013 15:54
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Hi,
I made a change to update MAT contribution for M7 (updated the p2repo location
and the version
project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Just a reminder that today (Wednesday) is the last day to make contributions
towards the M7 Sim. Rel. repository.
As usual, we will set the deadline for 5 PM Eastern ... but, glad to be
flexible for a few ad
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David M Williams <
> david_willi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Just a reminder that today (Wednesday) is the last day to make
>> contributions towards the M7 Sim. Rel. repository.
>>
>> As usual, we will set the de
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David M Williams
wrote:
> Just a reminder that today (Wednesday) is the last day to make
> contributions towards the M7 Sim. Rel. repository.
>
> As usual, we will set the deadline for 5 PM Eastern ... but, glad to be
> flexible for a few additional hours, if projec
Just a reminder that today (Wednesday) is the last day to make
contributions towards the M7 Sim. Rel. repository.
As usual, we will set the deadline for 5 PM Eastern ... but, glad to be
flexible for a few additional hours, if projects speaks up here to this
list and requests additional hour or
even in the face of bundle
oddities.
Thanks all,
From: Doug Schaefer
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 05/09/2012 06:30 PM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
OK. CDT is good to go.
.org>>
Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 5:04 PM
To: Cross project issues
mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
I take that back. We have a fix that will allow the community to test the CDT
with the Windows gcc compilers. I
ailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 3:58 PM
To: Cross project issues
mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
BTW, CDT is good to go. The next time the aggregator runs it&#x
ss project issues
mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
CDT is scrambling to fix some major issues. We may ask for more time. Hopefully
not.
Thanks,
Doug
From: David M Williams
mailto:david_willi...@us.ibm.com>>
R
eone
>
> knows off the top of their head).
>
>
> FYI, this can be seen by using the b3 aggregator editor, selecting
>
> the top level "aggregation" note, and then running the "validate"
>
> command from context menu. (Not even "validate aggregation",
now it'd be short notice to remove it ... but ... would also
>> appreciate someone clearly saying why its needed.
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735
>>>
>>>
>>> David M Williams---05/09/2012 10:45:14 AM---
project issues ,
Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
Status and outlook for M7
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Thanks for replying. But, I'm a
little confused,
e confused, as the be current aggregation builds are failing
> ou
>
> From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> To: laurent.gou...@obeo.fr, Cross project issues
> ,
> Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
> Sen
may ask for more time.
> Hopefully not.
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
>
> From: David M Williams
> Reply-To: Cross project issues
> Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 12:11 PM
>
> To: Cross project issues
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
&
ross project issues
mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Reminder ... it is +3 day! 5 PM this evening (Eastern) will be "cut-off" unless
someone asks for a few extra hours.
I removed the emf compare feature f
would also
appreciate someone clearly saying why its needed.
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735
From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: laurent.gou...@obeo.fr, Cross project issues
,
Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-
and EMF model).
Thanks,
From: Laurent Goubet
To: Cross project issues ,
Date: 05/09/2012 09:02 AM
Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hi,
Sorry about the delay before replying, May has
Hi,
Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot of holidays here :).
emf-compare.b3aggrcon indeed had one repository "disabled"... that was
only a leftover from a previous milestone and did not impact M7. We've
removed that repository from the file.
Laurent Goubet
Obeo
On 06/05/201
onday, May 07, 2012 3:59 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
David
Thanks for the status update. We will look into fixing the dependecy on
'org.eclipse.help.appserver' .
Wenfeng
From:
cros
: 05/06/2012 09:00 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
I am expecting m2e 1.1.0.20120505-1126 . I see this version mentioned in
juno.runAggregator job #356 [1], but staging repository contains an
ol
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hello, David,
Staging repository [1] appears to contain older version of m2e. Is this
expected at this point
m 1.0.0, to 1.1.0).
Thanks,
From: Igor Fedorenko
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 05/06/2012 04:41 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
Hello, David,
Staging re
Hello, David,
Staging repository [1] appears to contain older version of m2e. Is this
expected at this point or should I start investigating?
[1] http://download.eclipse.org/releases/staging/
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-05-06 3:38 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm alr
M Williams
[david_willi...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 12:38 PM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status!
First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2 primary
Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status!
First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2 primary build
from the Eclipse Project, so for the first time we have a pure and correct
4.2 repo. In the past, some things from 3.8 were "slipping in" through
aggregation due to
35 matches
Mail list logo
