Hi David, I seem doomed to be involved with projects that are +3 or more. :|
I believe that MFT is ready to go and just needed to be enabled, which Steffen took care of a couple of days ago. See: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378601 Steffen, should this be working now? Now that BIRT has had their site renamed and fixed some issues, I'm going to have another try at getting amp up and running as well. And no, the Virgo one isn't mine in this case. :) (Virgo Tooling isn't in Juno train.) cheers, Miles ______________________________ Miles T. Parker Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop http://tasktop.com Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP http://milesparker.blogspot.com On 2012-05-09, at 9:11 AM, David M Williams wrote: > Reminder ... it is +3 day! 5 PM this evening (Eastern) will be "cut-off" > unless someone asks for a few extra hours. > > I removed the emf compare feature from modeling category, since it was cause > build to fail. If there is some other one that's supposed to be there, please > add it back. > > The following still have disabled repositories or features: > > amp.b3aggrcon > equinox.b3aggrcon > jetty.b3aggrcon > mft.b3aggrcon > riena.b3aggrcon > virgo.b3aggrcon > > Any word? > > I can speak to the equinox one. See bug 378735[1]. It is related to the > org.eclipse.rcp.sdk.id "product". I _think_ I can add it back for RC1. But > is anyone using it? Can anyone document a use case? It has not been > working/available for all of Juno, so far, and no one has really complained, > and no one seems to have a clear id of if or why its needed. > So, I know it'd be short notice to remove it ... but ... would also > appreciate someone clearly saying why its needed. > > [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735 > > > <graycol.gif>David M Williams---05/09/2012 10:45:14 AM---Thanks for replying. > But, I'm a little confused, as the be current aggregation builds are failing > ou > > From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To: laurent.gou...@obeo.fr, Cross project issues > <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, > Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > > > Thanks for replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be current > aggregation builds are failing out-of-the-gate saying there is a problem with > the model, at the emf.compare in the "modeling category" does not refer to > the right one. And, apparently comes from several sources? (at least in > past?) so ... is there supposed to be _any_ emf.compare in Juno? Or is it > completely gone? If the later, I'll just remove it from the category. If the > the former ... I'll have to hunt around for which is "the right one" and use > it (so, hoping someone knows off the top of their head). > > FYI, this can be seen by using the b3 aggregator editor, selecting the top > level "aggregation" note, and then running the "validate" command from > context menu. (Not even "validate aggregation", just "validate" which just > validates the XML and EMF model). > > Thanks, > > > Laurent Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33 AM---Hi, Sorry about the delay before > replying, May has a lot of holidays here :). > > From: Laurent Goubet <laurent.gou...@obeo.fr> > To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, > Date: 05/09/2012 09:02 AM > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7 > Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > > > Hi, > > Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot of holidays here :). > > emf-compare.b3aggrcon indeed had one repository "disabled"... that was only a > leftover from a previous milestone and did not impact M7. We've removed that > repository from the file. > > Laurent Goubet > Obeo > > On 06/05/2012 21:38, David M Williams wrote: > > Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status! > > First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2 primary build from > the Eclipse Project, so for the first time we have a pure and correct 4.2 > repo. In the past, some things from 3.8 were "slipping in" through > aggregation due to the way the platform was producing and partially > (unknowingly) combining 3.8 and 4.2. But no more, 4.2 only. > > One impact of this, is the bundle 'org.eclipse.help.appserver' is no longer > available ... it was actually removed in 4.1, but it is being left in the 3.x > stream, even though 3.8 does not use it. It now correctly does _not_ show up > in 4.2 repo via aggregation. > > And, this "broke" BIRT ... so, I disabled that, which rippled across 3 or 4 > others that depend on BIRT charting. > I hope BIRT can live without that old bundle and use the jetty server now > provided by the platform (and used by the help system, in both 3.8 and 4.2). > http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/plain/bundles/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/porting/4.2/incompatibilities.html?h=R4_HEAD#help-appserver > > Then there were the (fairly) usual breakages in RAP runtime and Virgo based > on assumptions on certain platform specific versions, so I disabled those to > get a green build, and promote an initial M7 version to staging. Be sure to > check the reports (based on staging) to get as much cleaned up as possible > before M7: > http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/ > > In all, the following files have disabled repositories or features. It looks > worse than it is, but we need to get in completely "enabled" in the next few > days (or, remove it, if its some old thing that should not even be there any > longer). > > amp.b3aggrcon > birt.b3aggrcon > emf-compare.b3aggrcon > equinox.b3aggrcon > jetty.b3aggrcon > linuxtools.b3aggrcon > mat.b3aggrcon > mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon > mft.b3aggrcon > rap.b3aggrcon > riena.b3aggrcon > scout.b3aggrcon > virgo.b3aggrcon > > As always questions and clarifications are welcome. > > Thanks everyone, > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > [attachment "laurent_goubet.vcf" deleted by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM] > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
