I am not opposed to porting crossedit to gtk however.
The current difficulty I see with crossedit is that it is rather heavily
dependent on the server code. I think that the best would be at some point to
get the editor - being GTK, Athena or whatever else - get its own codebase,
alongside
On 1/29/06, Yann Chachkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it definitely wouldn't work anymore if significant changes occur in the
server code - in particular, getting rid of the Athena Editor would allow to
remove the separation between the common and server subdirectories -
something that
On 1/29/06, Mark Wedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest the following mappings (for both binaries and package names)
crossedit - crossedit
Arguably, crossedit should just disappear. This, however, may become more
or
less an issue depending on other changes (if a code
Understand this Yann. IF crossedit is removed I remove
myself. Do you want to lose your biggest current media
contributor? If so then remove crossedit.
I think you need to fork off crossfire and make your
own project where you can do whatever you want.
Perhapse crossfire-awsome.sf.net?
--- Yann
Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:
Understand this Yann. IF crossedit is removed I remove
myself. Do you want to lose your biggest current media
contributor? If so then remove crossedit.
I seem to see this ultimatum almost once a week now (do this or I leave)
This carries no weight for me. I'm
Brendan Lally wrote:
On 1/29/06, Mark Wedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest the following mappings (for both binaries and package names)
crossedit - crossedit
Arguably, crossedit should just disappear. This, however, may become more
or
less an issue depending on other changes
Check the CVS logs. I have stopped committing about a
week ago. If you remove crossedit I will not restart.
--- Mark Wedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:
Understand this Yann. IF crossedit is removed I
remove
myself. Do you want to lose your biggest current
media
Lol.
--- todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose this would be a nice perk and a big
incentive to remove
crossedit, but you've quit so many times before that
it just isn't a
reliable enough promise to base a decision like this
on ;)
Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:
Understand this
I am not opposed to porting crossedit to gtk however.
But if my favorite editor is removed outright... java
is not an option. However crossedit works great (IMHO)
now, so there really is no reason to change it. All
this constant talk of removing things is
displeasurable, thus my retirement for a
If crossedit dissappears then I dissapear.
I guess that is what you all want though.
Should CF fork?
--- Mark Wedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arguably, crossedit should just disappear. This,
however, may become more or
less an issue depending on other changes (if a code
restructuring
On 1/28/06, Brendan Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be inclined to say that the quickest way to do that would be to
have a deliberate compatibility break,
oh, one other thing which is vaguely related to that, a 2.0 release
would also seem to be a good time to rename some binaries. Currently
11 matches
Mail list logo
