Re: Re: Re: Re: [crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

2006-01-18 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Well enjoy raping the server. I'm retiring from CF untill a certain unnamed feature I was promised 1/2 a year ago (no not plots) is in. See you soon or never. --- Yann Chachkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Except that you are not working on one section of > the > code, you are restructuring th

Re: Re: Re: Re: [crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

2006-01-18 Thread Yann Chachkoff
> Except that you are not working on one section of the code, you are restructuring the whole server into diffrent modules. This means that if you develop in cvs there will be breakage with any and everyone else as you sweeping edits touch every facet of the glory that is crossfire. Well, the requ

Re: Re: Re: [crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

2006-01-18 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Except that you are not working on one section of the code, you are restructuring the whole server into diffrent modules. This means that if you develop in cvs there will be breakage with any and everyone else as you sweeping edits touch every facet of the glory that is crossfire. The C in CVS may

Re: Re: Re: [crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

2006-01-18 Thread Yann Chachkoff
> Indeed. Just because the server can be modularized thus blocking any other > new development whilst that takes place doesn't mean it's a good idea. There is no reason to block any other development. I suppose you know that the "C" in "CVS" means "Concurrent" ? > I for one frown on the idea o

Re: Re: Re: [crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

2006-01-18 Thread Yann Chachkoff
> Oh if that's the case let me just commit all the mlab maps in their current > uni-directory form over the objections of everyone else that prefers > multi-directory. Know why I don't do that; because everyone else prefers > multi-directory. Did you need the permission of anybody to write thos