Description
We would like to add a mechanism in Crosswalk to control API permissions for
both Crosswalk .xpk packages and Tizen legacy .wgt packages. For crosswalk
packages, permissions needed by an application will be declared in its
manifest, and for Tizen widgets they are stored in config.xml
It’s OK to rename it to removeAllCookies, but removeAllCookie is the name used
by android.webkit.CookieManager, how about keep the names align with
android.webkit.CookieManager methods?
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/CookieManager.html#removeAllCookie()
-Chun
From: Kenne
Hi Zoltan, Sakari and Anssi,
Thanks for the summary of the DataStore discussion.
Currently Contacts and Messaging API implementation on Android(without
DataStore) are reaching their final stages of development. By the end of this
week we will be able to submit two Pull Requests, but 80% of the
Shiliu, the link is invalid, could you check that?
FYI, Raphael still has concern about this flag, so is not enabled on bulidbot.
CC Ningxin because XDK is main customer of windows platform.
Thanks,
Halton.
From: Wang, Shiliu
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:54 AM
To: Huo, Halton; Menard, Alexi
Weird, download_from_google_storage will fail if gsutils not configured.
If possible, could you share me the public buildbot information so that I can
look?
Thanks,
Halton.
> -Original Message-
> From: Crosswalk-dev
> [mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] On Behalf O
Hi Sakari,
Could you make a final decision which namespace that sysapp API will using?
navigator.* or xwalk.sysapps.*?
Thanks,
Halton.
From: Poussa, Sakari
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 7:04 PM
To: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Cc: Huo, Halton; crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
Subject:
It’s similar to Android WebView(aw contents). I’m not sure the status of chrome
for Android since it’s closed source but definitely it should support it.
Gao Chun, any comments about store the cookies?
Yongsheng
From: Crosswalk-dev [mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org]
On B
Hello,
We recently added a new unittest executable 'xwalk_dbus_unittest',
that doesn't need to link with full Crosswalk runtime or even the
Content API, and I would like to know: what's the best way to teach the
bot run extra unittest programs?
Note that this particular unittest program will exis
LGTM. Kudos for the detailed description.
On 19-11-2013 14:44, Menard, Alexis wrote:
LGTM.
Software Engineer @
Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Nov 19, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
mailto:kenneth.christian...@gmail.com>> wrote:
LGTM. Very nice detailed description of th
"Huo, Halton" writes:
> To Raphael, could you do below steps for canary buildbot?
The experimental public build bots and the release ones have been
adjusted -- only a few new dependencies had to be installed.
-Dbuildtype=Official is not being passed as we haven't decided on that
yet, and no ch
"Huo, Halton" writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Just let you know, I meet build issue as described in
> https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-359 , Raphael said
> Mrunal meet same issue also. It is unsure my environment issue or a
> bug.
This should be unrelated to this thread, FWIW.
_
lgtm, especially appcore-glib part.
Feel free to remove AppcoreContext in xwalk.
- DS
From: Crosswalk-dev [crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] on
behalf of Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho [caio.olive...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18,
LGTM.
Software Engineer @
Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Nov 19, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
mailto:kenneth.christian...@gmail.com>> wrote:
LGTM. Very nice detailed description of the various steps.
Kenneth
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Fi
LGTM
BR,
Mikhail
From: Crosswalk-dev [crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] on
behalf of Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho [caio.olive...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:44 PM
To: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
Subject: [
LGTM. Very nice detailed description of the various steps.
Kenneth
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <
caio.olive...@intel.com> wrote:
> *Description*
>
> We would like to add a mode of running Crosswalk in which the main
> Crosswalk process ("Browser Process") wil
Now the PR get merged, repos are open.
The trybot and internal buildbot(wrt-build.sh.intel.com) and canary buildbot
need some reconfiguration steps, do not be panic if you meet. Raphael, Shiliu
and myself will fix that.
To Raphael, could you do below steps for canary buildbot?
download_from_goo
I plan to implement as an extension, it’s easy to maintain when chromium or
spec changes.
Zhenyu
From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen [mailto:kenneth.christian...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:03 PM
To: Liang, Zhenyu
Cc: crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org
Subject: Re: [Crosswal
Sorry, my bad. I thought all the sysapps APIs are under navigator, but seems
that they are using xwalk.sysapps.*
Then this API should follow that pattern as well. Which I guess is what Kenneth
is also saying.
BR; Sakari
From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
mailto:kenneth.christian...@gmail.com>>
Is this a Java Interface you came up with or is it similar to what Chrome
for Android uses? How are you going to store the cookies? DB, as separate
files? What do Chrome for Android do?
Kenneth
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Gao, Chun wrote:
> Summary:
>
> This implementation is about cooki
Still, all other sysapps API's are "prefixed" as they are under the
sysapps.* namespace. Thus if the specs change at some point they can be
migrated to another place and two incompatible implementations can be
supported in parallel, with the one under sysapps.* as deprecated. When you
add things di
Hi all,
Just let you know, I meet build issue as described in
https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-359 , Raphael said Mrunal meet
same issue also.
It is unsure my environment issue or a bug.
Shiliu or myself will try to deploy tizen trybot to check.
Thanks,
Halton.
> -Original M
Raphael,
Is there a way to just use make if you don¹t want the full rpm but just
the xwalk binary? That is, to skip the dance around the rpm creation.
If so, that should be documented in the packaging/README and later in the
wiki.
BR; Sakari
On 11/18/13, 17:53, "Raphael Kubo da Costa"
wrote:
Hi,
I would not like to prefix it. Actually, I think it would be fine to use the
namespace as in the the spec (navigator). All the SysApps APIs are now more or
less experimental and if we start second guessing what is more mature than the
other, we’ll have this discussion for each API.
Thus, m
Thanks Raphael! Works great and with some much less steps.
BR; Sakari
On 11/18/13, 17:53, "Raphael Kubo da Costa"
wrote:
>Now that a few days have passed and nothing exploded, it's time to
>announce commit da52b4060e684e7a432543b34fd91831ece48d89 to everyone who
>was not following pull request
On 11/18/13, 21:44, "Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho"
wrote:
>
>The high level design for this approach was done by Ming Bai and
>Gustavo Barbieri, with various contributions from others, see
>https://docs.google.com/a/intel.com/document/d/1q2Zl_P949NLe5YnQoLP2OWcZSt
>VJgXyHKZDUwhiUxJQ/edit?usp=sh
25 matches
Mail list logo
