RealSense.
-Original Message-
From: Crosswalk-dev
[mailto:crosswalk-dev-boun...@lists.crosswalk-project.org] On Behalf Of Hu,
Ningxin
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 7:06 PM
To: Liang, Zhenyu; 'crosswalk-dev@lists.crosswalk-project.org'
Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to Implement: Binary
@lists.crosswalk-project.org'
Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to Implement: Binary Messaging
Interface for Crosswalk External Extension
Yes, certainly.
I assume it means LGTM from you. :) Thanks!
Since I'm neither architect nor owner, you need to get LGTMs from them
:-)
Ping
-project.org'
Subject: Re: [Crosswalk-dev] Intent to Implement: Binary Messaging Interface
for Crosswalk External Extension
Yes, certainly.
I assume it means LGTM from you. :) Thanks!
Since I'm neither architect nor owner, you need to get LGTMs from them
:-)
Ping @Halton for extension, @Lin
My suggestion is to introduce a new version of current messaging interface
instead of a whole new interface.
struct XW_MessagingInterface_2 {
void (*Register)(XW_Extension extension, XW_HandleMessageCallback
handle_message);
void (*PostMessage)(XW_Instance instance, const char* message);
Yes, certainly.
Since I'm neither architect nor owner, you need to get LGTMs from them :-)
On 7/17/15 17:44 , Hu, Ningxin ningxin...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Zhenyu,
My suggestion is to introduce a new version of current messaging
interface
instead of a whole new interface.
struct
