Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report

2000-01-04 Thread Andreas Bogk
Sameer Parekh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The DVD CCA does not have a strong case, but they will not back down. They have too much riding on this. As Lucky has stated, their entire existence is built upon licensing the CSS technology. Since it is no longer a trade secret, they have

Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report

2000-01-04 Thread Ray Hirschfeld
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:43:52 -0800 (PST) From: bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm a little confused. Are you saying that as of October it will be legal to do any amount of reverse-engineering, publishing, and writing to APIs you want without violating the original author's copyright? Does that

Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report

2000-01-04 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 11:46:48AM -0800, bram wrote: On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Lucky Green wrote: 1. CSS was reverse engineered from Xing's DVD player. 2. Xing's player requires the user to click on a button accepting a license agreement prohibiting reverse engineering. 3. Reverse

Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report

2000-01-04 Thread Phil Karn
No, October 28, 2000 is when the act of circumventing an effective technological measure becomes a violation (with exceptions for fair But if it was an "effective technological measure", it couldn't have been circumvented. And by circumventing CSS, wasn't it shown to not be an effective

Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report

2000-01-04 Thread John Gilmore
No, October 28, 2000 is when the act of circumventing an effective technological measure becomes a violation (with exceptions for fair But if it was an "effective technological measure", it couldn't have been circumvented. And by circumventing CSS, wasn't it shown to not be an effective

Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report

2000-01-04 Thread bram
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Ray Hirschfeld wrote: Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 18:43:52 -0800 (PST) From: bram [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm a little confused. Are you saying that as of October it will be legal to do any amount of reverse-engineering, publishing, and writing to APIs you want without

starting up servers that need access to secrets

2000-01-04 Thread Jeffrey M. Smith
Is there a good solution to the problem of starting up a network server that needs access to an encrypted database? For instance, a server that has its own RSA key pair encrypted on disk, and needs to decrypt it during operation so the private key is available in memory? The only examples I've

starting up servers that need access to secrets (fwd)

2000-01-04 Thread Jim Choate
- Forwarded message from Jeffrey M. Smith - Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 16:40:40 -0500 From: "Jeffrey M. Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: starting up servers that need access to secrets Is there a good solution to the problem of starting up a network server that needs access to an