Bill Frantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12:26 PM -0700 7/26/99, Rick Smith wrote:
At 10:48 AM 7/26/99 -0700, Tom Perrine wrote:
At that time (1985), every MLS-possible system that had been produced
had been cancelled (or died for other reasons) Sure,
some of these (ours included) had
At 12:26 PM -0700 7/26/99, Rick Smith wrote:
At 10:48 AM 7/26/99 -0700, Tom Perrine wrote:
I'll take that I worked on systems to handle highly-classified
data in full multi-level environements (A1 candidates).
Been there, done that. Got the scars. At least we got Uncle Sam to pay the
Oh, and there's one other thing: There is no companion bill to SAFE in the
Senate. So assuming (this is a big assumption) the Senate approves ProCODE
or something, then the differences between the two bills would be hammered
out in a conference committee.
Needless to say, this would be very
Tim May wrote:
Fourth, and this is a serious question, not a rhetorical one: What the hell
ever happened to the movement to develop offshore and them skirt U.S.
export laws thusly? Remember how RSA had created a European branch would
would supposedly develop RSA-type softwar and then throw
[CC:'s to list I don't subscribe to deleted.]
one possible escape clause here is a constitutional provision
regarding immunity of legislators for acts in congress:
[from article 1, section 6]
".. for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be
questioned in any other place."
..
Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The sponsor of yesterday's amendment, Rep. Weldon, said that he wants to
have a classified briefing //on the House floor// to scare members into
voting his way. Look for killer amendments to SAFE to be offered during
that floor vote, perhaps even
At 07:31 AM 7/26/99 -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
".. for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be
questioned in any other place."
But then again, i'm not a lawyer, and I'm also not sure how this
provision has been interpreted in the past..
IANL but as you can imagine, members
I'm going to sleep soon so let me try a short answer...
The House Rules committee decides what legislation will go to the House
floor, what amendments will be in order, and in what sequence they will be
presented (which is often very important). The House Rules committee is in
a practice an
The text of the amendment (in PDF):
http://www.house.gov/hasc/press.htm
http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/20872.html
Industry Crypto Bill in Peril
by Declan McCullagh
5:00 p.m. 21.Jul.99.PDT
Right. Some of the congresscritters who voted yesterday for the natsec
version of SAFE were ostensible supporters of the business version.
True, this particular natsec version of SAFE doesn't include domestic
controls -- plenty of time for Freeh to try that later -- but export
relief?
10 matches
Mail list logo