At 2:01 PM +0200 9/14/99, Kuehn, Ulrich wrote:
Hi,
please find here included a mail from Holger Klawitter, the author of one of
the mentioned palm cipher programs... He would have liked to recieve the
critique himself.
Ulrich
---
[quoted form Holger
Hi,
please find here included a mail from Holger Klawitter, the author of one of
the mentioned palm cipher programs... He would have liked to recieve the
critique himself.
Ulrich
---
[quoted form Holger Klawitter [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 5:05 PM -0400 9/9/99, Thomas W. Kellar wrote:
I wrote a rc4 based encryption/decryption program for my TI86. You can
enter an alphabetic key (up to 256 characters). Enter some uppercase only
alphabetic plaintext, then it displays decimal numbers representing the
encryption of the plaintext.
I wrote a rc4 based encryption/decryption program for my TI86. You can
enter an alphabetic key (up to 256 characters). Enter some uppercase only
alphabetic plaintext, then it displays decimal numbers representing the
encryption of the plaintext. In decrypt mode you enter your key, then the
At 09:23 AM 9/8/99 -0400, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
BTW, several of these units also permit assembly language
programming. The 83/83+ is Z80 based. The 89/92+ are 68000 based,
with 188K of RAM. PGP isn't out of the question on those.
...
Staples stocks the TI-83+ at $92.99. So for under a hundred
At 8:32 PM -0700 9/8/99, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 09:23 AM 9/8/99 -0400, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
...
Staples stocks the TI-83+ at $92.99. So for under a hundred bucks and
a little time spent in TIBasic programming you can own an
off-the-shelf coding machine using strong encryption, interoperable
At 1:49 PM -0400 9/6/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
If a field worker might have access to a computer in country but
would not be in a position to use PGP, I'd suggest CipherSaber, which
is based on RC4 and is simple enough to program from memory
[I have my doubts about the reality of this description -- the entire
stego description seems like fantasy, especially given the low
bandwidths available into many countries, and the obviousness of the
whole thing. However, I'm forwarding it in spite of my bogometer
beeping... Caveat Lector...
Perry writes:
I have my doubts about the reality of this description -- the
entire stego description seems like fantasy, especially given the
low bandwidths available into many countries, and the obviousness
of the whole thing...
I think that you misunderstand the purpose of the
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
If a field worker might have access to a computer in country but
would not be in a position to use PGP, I'd suggest CipherSaber, which
is based on RC4 and is simple enough to program from memory (see
http://ciphersaber.gurus.com). Almost all PCs
In v04210152b3f61485313b@[192.168.248.7], on 09/03/99
at 05:20 PM, Dave Del Torto [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does anyone (or you, Bruce?) have a URL handy to/for an paper (by Paul
Brown in the UK?) speculating on a RNG weakness in Solitiare's (Bruce's
playing card cipher)? I've been searching
Does anyone (or you, Bruce?) have a URL handy to/for an paper (by
Paul Brown in the UK?) speculating on a RNG weakness in Solitiare's
(Bruce's playing card cipher)? I've been searching the web
unsuccessfully. The paper may mention it as "Pontifex", as it was
referred to in "Cryptonomicon."
12 matches
Mail list logo
