> At 06:18 PM 9/9/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> >
> >> Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the
> >> Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic
> >> really isn't bad for something like RC4)
> >
At 12:14 AM -0700 9/10/99, Bill Stewart wrote:
>At 06:18 PM 9/9/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
>>
>>> Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the
>>> Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic
>>> really
At 06:18 PM 9/9/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
>
>> Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the
>> Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic
>> really isn't bad for something like RC4)
>
>If I understa
> > Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the
> > Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic
> > really isn't bad for something like RC4)
>
> If I understand it correctly, there exists a Pilot C (C++ ?) development
> suite for Windows from Metrowe
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the
> Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic
> really isn't bad for something like RC4)
If I understand it correctly, there exists a Pilot C (C++ ?) developmen
