- Original Message -
From: "Ed Gerck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [!! SPAM] Re: Is AES better than RC4
Please note that my email was way different in scope. My opening
sentence, where I basically said that it does not make much sense
to compare RC4 with AES, was c
EITHER hash the key OR discard the
first bytes).
Cheers, Ed Gerck
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Ed Gerck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [!! SPAM] Re: Is AES better than RC4
...
-
The Cr
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Gerck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [!! SPAM] Re: Is AES better than RC4
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
SOP: discard first 100's of bytes
This is part of the lack of key agility.
Using it securely requires so much in the way of heroi
- Original Message -
From: "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [!! SPAM] Re: Is AES better than RC4
--
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
> RC4 should have been retired a decade ago,
Why?
It is in general distuingable from random, actually quite quickly.
The
--
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
> RC4 should have been retired a decade ago,
Why?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
pvLUSroPw35whI+/0Tq1IYPZh/GDEidGMu+4KvZc
4zyBqLBt4fFho62NSUZuECGjiLrFpqppx7lXuvebv
---
--
James A. Donald
>> AES is new, and people keep claiming progress towards
>> breaking it, without however, so far producing any
>> breaks.
>>
>> RC4 is old and has numerous known weaknesses, which
>> are tricky to code around, and have caught many an
>> implementor - notice for example Wifi.
On 23 May 2006, at 3:15 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
AES is new, and people keep claiming progress towards
breaking it, without however, so far producing any
breaks.
RC4 is old and has numerous known weaknesses, which are
tricky to code around, and have caught many an
implementor - notice
On 5/23/06, James A. Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AES is new, and people keep claiming progress towards
breaking it, without however, so far producing any
breaks.
RC4 is old and has numerous known weaknesses, which are
tricky to code around, and have caught many an
implementor - notice for
RC4 should have been retired a decade ago, that it has not is due solely to
the undereducated going with "whatever's fastest." It's time we allowed RC4
to stay dead.
Joe
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Un
--
AES is new, and people keep claiming progress towards
breaking it, without however, so far producing any
breaks.
RC4 is old and has numerous known weaknesses, which are
tricky to code around, and have caught many an
implementor - notice for example Wifi. But these are
known weaknesses, an
10 matches
Mail list logo