On 3/16/15 1:58 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> Is this not the old chained crypto argument?
Well, no, the old chained crypto argument try to argue that "if a crypto
A is broken, then crypto B will save the cryptosystem" .
Instead i'm specifically brainstorming (but i maybe perfectly wrong!)
w.t.r. provi
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 01:08:48PM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists
wrote:
> > you should be much more open about your limits.
> Stef, don't troll! :-)
your debating style is cute, ad-hominems, generalisms, dodging of hard
questions, lots of weasel words. not very convincing.
what is less
