This was expected.
As Skype definitely ruined its reputation as free end-to-end application for
secure communication, other products are taking their chances.
"Agencies showing sudden interest in encrypted comm" ---
http://gcn.com/blogs/cybereye/2013/06/agencies-sudden-interest-encrypted-com
m.as
On 2013-06-30 5:13 PM, Danilo Gligoroski wrote:
This was expected.
As Skype definitely ruined its reputation as free end-to-end application for
secure communication, other products are taking their chances.
"Agencies showing sudden interest in encrypted comm" ---
http://gcn.com/blogs/cybereye/20
On 30-06-13 09:44, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2013-06-30 5:13 PM, Danilo Gligoroski wrote:
>> This was expected.
>> As Skype definitely ruined its reputation as free end-to-end
>> application for
>> secure communication, other products are taking their chances.
>>
>> "Agencies showing sudden inter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 30, 2013, at 12:44 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
> Silent Circle expects end users to manage their own keys, which is of course
> the only way for end users to be genuinely secure. Everything else is snake
> oil, or rapidly turns into snake oi
On 2013-06-30, at 3:44 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2013-06-30 5:13 PM, Danilo Gligoroski wrote:
>> This was expected.
>> As Skype definitely ruined its reputation as free end-to-end application for
>> secure communication, other products are taking their chances.
>>
>> "Agencies showing sud
On 2013-07-01 8:55 AM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
On 2013-06-30, at 3:44 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
On 2013-06-30 5:13 PM, Danilo Gligoroski wrote:
This was expected.
As Skype definitely ruined its reputation as free end-to-end application for
secure communication, other products are taking their
On 2013-06-30, at 7:36 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2013-07-01 8:55 AM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
>> On 2013-06-30, at 3:44 AM, James A. Donald
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 2013-06-30 5:13 PM, Danilo Gligoroski wrote:
>>>
This was expected.
As Skype definitely ruined its reputation as fr
>
>> if ever we managed to provide an interface where users successfully managed
>> their own keys without screwing up.
>>
The only answer is to take key management out of the users' hands. And
do it automatically as part of the work flow.
Guido.
__
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Guido Witmond wrote:
> The only answer is to take key management out of the users' hands. And
> do it automatically as part of the work flow.
You need at least a Big Fat Warning when the new fingerprint
differs from the cached one, and it's not just expir
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Guido Witmond wrote:
>
>> The only answer is to take key management out of the users' hands. And
>> do it automatically as part of the work flow.
>
> You need at least a Big Fat Warning when the new fing
10 matches
Mail list logo
