Nice and clean overall. Just some point you might want to consider:
- the CSS validator objects to an empty color: rule for .proprieta at
line 398. AFAIK you're not using it anywhere, so you might just cull it
- text sized in pixels can't be resized in IE. Might try to use ems,
percents or keyw
Here is a neat CSS menu - if anyone is looking for one
http://koivi.com/css-menus/
Regards,
Abyss
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incuti
On 1/28/06, Bob Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to fix the menu which is a List-O-Rama CSS menu
> (Dreamweaver extention) and I may try a sucker fish instead but in IE6 the
> height difference is really spread out as compared to Firefox, Opera, and
> Netscape.
If it
Hello all
My first time posting, so excuse me if this message doesn't belong here.
I have an msn group and we're running a web design contest I thought I'd
mention.
It's mostly for newbies and perhaps some intermediate level folks.
The prize is web hosting for a year w/domain name. The deadline
On Jan 28, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Abyss Information wrote:
> it falls over and doesn't work is there a CSS hack for this?
CSSd WIKI search for "PNG":
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?action=find&find=PNG
CSSd Archive search for "transparency":
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/css-discu
Bob Boisvert wrote:
> http://www.sppots.org/testing/new/
> I would like to fix the menu which is a List-O-Rama CSS menu
> (Dreamweaver extention) and I may try a sucker fish instead but in
> IE6 the height difference is really spread out as compared to
> Firefox, Opera, and Netscape.
Add a 'h
We all know about PNG transparency and its problems with ie (at least i would
hope so -for those that dont go to
http://koivi.com/ie-png-transparency/ and look via IE )
anyway my point is
you have to add a heap of code for transparency with IE - my question is when
you want to use it with a CS
Hi All,
I was wondering if you have the time, if you could look at this layout, it
holds up to about a 200% increase in text size before falling out of the
container. I would like to fix the menu which is a List-O-Rama CSS menu
(Dreamweaver extention) and I may try a sucker fish instead but in IE6
Derek,
On Jan 28, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Tunnel 7 wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This is my first tableless layout and I have one bug that I just can't
> figure out. When you hover over the body links the footer "jumps" - it
> looks like about 10 pixels of padding are added. It can best be seen
> on
> this
> But for some reason the height doesnt stretch with the content in Firefox
If you just let the content in #container stretch it, you can just
remove height: 100% and #container would be the correct height.
Ricky
__
css-discuss [
Hello.
This is my first tableless layout and I have one bug that I just can't
figure out. When you hover over the body links the footer "jumps" - it
looks like about 10 pixels of padding are added. It can best be seen on
this page (mouse over body link then mouseover logo at top (it will jump
ba
Hi,
I made this page: http://e.domaindlx.com/lowenf/radius/index.html
But for some reason the height doesnt stretch with the content in Firefox
(IE is fine, that's a miracle).
I used these guidelines:
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/100percheight.html
And it worked before and I've been searching f
At 4:56 PM +0100 1/28/06, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
>Ok, but I have a different opinion in handling such things!!!
Jochen and I will continue this discussion off-list. The public
thread is now finished. Anyone who wants to weigh in on the topic
can contact me or both of us off-list, and if
Google analytics is nice and free...I use it.
http://www.google.com/analytics/
On Jan 27, 2006, at 9:07 PM, {tonyFelice} wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good resource for browser/platform statistics?
>
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROT
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 16:33 schrieb Eric A. Meyer:
> At 5:15 AM +0100 1/28/06, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
> >The only thing I want to tell the people on the list is that there might
> > be some subscribers who use a mailsystem with a vulnability.
>
> That's a laudable intent. Here's how I t
At 5:15 AM +0100 1/28/06, Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
>The only thing I want to tell the people on the list is that there might be
>some subscribers who use a mailsystem with a vulnability.
That's a laudable intent. Here's how I think it would have been
better handled:
* Get in touch with
There are many broswr/flash player bugs associated with wmode="opaque"
or "transparent", so test thoroughly.
On 1/28/06, Michael Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Tanya Renne wrote:
> > can someone diagnose a fix for that? Z-index is still baffling to me.
>
> I sugges
{tonyFelice} wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good resource for browser/platform statistics?
>
If you are trying to make a decision about which browsers to support,
the *only* place you should be looking is your own site's logs.
Determine what your actual audience uses, not some sample of an unkno
What is the purpose of the span? Screenreader users won't see the
colors. If it's for emphasis, you might want to do something like this
instead:
Markup:
Leroy Jenkins
CSS:
h1.strong {color:blue;}
h1.em {color:red}
Add additional CSS settings to each of the above to change what the
browser defau
John Bishop - alternative it wrote:
> ... Just a curio with the 'Search' form at:
> http://www2.petrescue.com.au/newindex.htm - the spacing between the rows
> differs quite noticeably between FF and IE. I've forced padding & margins
> for all of the div's & form elements; any idea why this might be
20 matches
Mail list logo
