From: "R. Alan Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Firefox also displays the next line of text on the same
>line as the nav bar (though it's in a totally different div in the code)
>and IE6 doesn't.
> http://www.dvmvac.com/REDESIGNnew/navtest.shtml
Does adding the clear property to #divtitle do what
Thank you Georg !!
I made the suggested change and the nav bar now displays correctly in
both IE6 and Firefox !!
Unfortunately, Firefox also displays the next line of text on the same
line as the nav bar (though it's in a totally different div in the code)
and IE6 doesn't. After trying all sor
Questions on this draft page I'm working on:
Page: http://www.ambientglow.com/garage/gearhart/Web/sample.html
Css: http://www.ambientglow.com/garage/gearhart/Web/css/gearhart.css
I'm using a background image in the #content which basically fills in
the bottom of the logo used in the #banner. Bec
Hi,
Please spare a moment and help me with my site tests. I have been
trying to clear floats in the main content. It has worked on all the
browsers listed below except i.e. 5.2-mac.
http://www.3pointdesign.com/
http://www.3pointdesign.com/styles/one.css
Safari 2.0.4
Firefox mozilla 1.5.0.9
Suzanne Bernard wrote:
>> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
>> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
>> in IE6 and Firefox.
>>
>
>
>
> Suzanne Bernard
>
>
>
This is a valid markup version of your file (thanks to Tidy On-line). I
did not
On 2007/04/15 14:28 (GMT-0400) Suzanne Bernard apparently typed:
>> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
>> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
>> in IE6 and Firefox.
Did you recently change computers? Do you test on more than one? If so, are
th
From: "Suzanne Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> http://www.nycss.org/
>I've changed the Doctype to 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/
> TR/html4/strict.dtd"> as suggested by Georg and Philippe and it hasn't
>appeared to fix the problem. And the results at
>http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www
Shelly wrote:
> I'm having an issue here I've never come across before.
>
> I've got a site changed out from tables to XHTML Transitional/CSS. I
> need a couple of conditional comments for teensy edits, but I'm having a
> headache of a time.
>
> If I set the conditional like so:
>
>
>
> (wi
what if you write it like this:
removing the spaces
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discu
I'm having an issue here I've never come across before.
I've got a site changed out from tables to XHTML Transitional/CSS. I
need a couple of conditional comments for teensy edits, but I'm having a
headache of a time.
If I set the conditional like so:
(with or without spaces), then IE6 read
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
> Ever tempted to put at the begining of the CSS declarations,
>
> *{height: 100%;}
'hasLayout' is not a cure - it's _the_ disease, so I would only try that
in cases where IE works flawless and I'm really, really, bored ;-)
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
___
> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
> in IE6 and Firefox.
I've changed the Doctype to http://www.w3.org/
TR/html4/strict.dtd"> as suggested by Gunlaug and Philippe and it hasn't
appeared to fix the probl
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Hyde-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] site check please, picture links added
> Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
>> http://test.fatpawdesign.com/
Sorry if this has been asked before. I just discovered that the CSS
editor I am using doesn't preview background images properly when I use
a link connection to the css file - whereas with the @import connection
it works perfectly.
So I am just curious as to the pros and cons of one method ver
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
> http://test.fatpawdesign.com/
> Above URL links to page with picture links that show what I mean.
I suggest you add a 'hasLayout' trigger...
#pageheader {height: 100%;}
...but I can't check if that'll make IE7 clear properly.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug
http://test.fatpawdesign.com/
Sorry about lack of clarity regarding problem. Above URL links to page with
picture links that show what I mean.
Cheers,
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hyde-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [css-d] site check please,need help with lower nav in
Del Wegener wrote:
> I am pretty new at css, but aren't font sizes controlled by an item on the
> View menu of each of the browsers in question.
Yes, they are.
Browsers' font resizing option(s) are always a potential cause for
differences, so that's a very timely reminder.
FWIW: none of my bro
David Dorward wrote:
> If by "pass" you mean "Fails to recognise the non-standard public
> identifier, warns about not knowing if it should be treating this as
> XML or SGML[1], uses the URI to the DTD instead of its local catalog
> for HTML 4.01 Strict, and then validates against that".
>
> [1] T
> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different in
> IE6 and Firefox. >This was not the case last time I checked, and I can't
> figure out what I've inadvertently changed to cause this (I want them both
> in the
This page
http://rgtoday.com/rg/new/
looks as expected in FireFox, last two versions of Netscape, last two versions
of Opera, and IE7. In IE6 the last rounded corner-producing div in each column
has a large gap above it.
Any idea what I've done to cause it?
Thanks very much.
joel
--
No
On 15/04/07, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN
> > to
> > DTD HTML 4.01//EN
> Browsers seem to be happy switching to "standard mode" for both variants
> AFAICS, and the validator also gives them both a pass.
If by "pass" you mean "Fails to recognise the non-s
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> should be
> http://www.w3.org/
> TR/html4/strict.dtd">
>
> from
> DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN
> to
> DTD HTML 4.01//EN
Is that just for the sake of following "recommendations"[1], or is there
a flaw in our knowledge about browsers "mode switching"[2] ?
Browsers seem
On Apr 15, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4.01/strict.dtd";>
>
> The correct would be:
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>
should be
http://www.w3.org/
TR/html4/strict.dtd">
from
DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN
to
DTD HTML 4.01//EN
Philippe
---
Philipp
23 matches
Mail list logo