Nice non-original sermon.
Do you also have a suggestion for the solution of the original poster's problem?
Bruce
This topic has been discussed so exhaustively over the past few
years, I'm frankly surprised you're raising it again here as though
it were new terrain to be explored. And
At 5/20/2007 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you also have a suggestion for the solution of the original
poster's problem?
As I keep saying, it depends on what the OP really wants as the final
effect. He said:
At 5/19/2007 09:08 PM, Kevin wrote:
I have two images that I would like
Hi Jeff,
1. Images are not block elements, so applying float to them will
trigger funny experiences with some browsers. So either add display:
block to the css or build a wrapper div around the images.
2. Your clearing div is causing the space problem, since IE will
reserve some space inside
Hi all,
Before I resign myself to it not being possible with CSS, I thought I'd put a
little problem to the great minds on this list.
If you take a look at:
http://demo.29degrees.co.uk/highlight/
... you will see what I am trying to achieve. The first example looks slightly
cramped and
Hi All
I'm new to this list, so thanks for any answers you can provide as I'm
generally a C# developer and am still getting up to speed on CSS design. My
apologies for my somewhat noob question(s).
I've been having a lot of trouble getting a design right for a website that
I'm designing. I
Francesco Rizzi wrote:
So, my question for the list is:
why should we use css rules in this scenario instead of br tags ?
Let's call it separating content (HTML) from presentation (CSS). Use
technologies for their intended, and standards compliant, purposes. Use
1) Use HTML for well
What I am looking for is to have image#1 and image#2 horizontally next to each
other
on the same line. I want the mouse over large image 1 to overlap both image 1
and
image 2 without displacing them.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
Hi Jens,
Please excuse me for butting in here, but I'm very much a learner
with CSS, especially with positioning elements, and I'd like to be
able to understand this a little more.
1. Images are not block elements, so applying float to them will
trigger funny experiences with some browsers.
I would greatly appreciate it if the folks on this list could help me with a
couple of problems in the following layout:
http://www.identitysciences.com/layouts/test.html
In Firefox and Safari, all seems well. In IE7, the lower part of the footer
text is cut off.
In IE6, the images on the left
Ladies Gentlemen-
Does anyone know how to create the dropdown menu on this site
(rollover the Artist selection in the main nav):
http://www.islandrecords.com
I'm guessing that this is some sort of styled/modified suckerfish
dropdown but I haven't been able to find out how to do it. If anyone
I'm guessing that this is some sort of styled/modified suckerfish
dropdown but I
haven't been able to find out how to do it. If anyone can provide some
direction that would really be great.
I'm not sure if this is exactly what you want, but this seems to get it
close to the feeling of their
At 5/21/2007 05:23 AM, jana coyle wrote:
What I am looking for is to have image#1 and image#2 horizontally
next to each other
on the same line. I want the mouse over large image 1 to overlap
both image 1 and
image 2 without displacing them.
Kevin,
The reason your images aren't side-by-side
Cool. Thanks for the quick response, Scott. But how can I now create
columns with line breaks like in the example (islandrecords.com)?
My apologies if the answer is obvious. I'm relatively new to this.
Thanks, John
On 5/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing that this
At 5/21/2007 07:38 AM, John Lee wrote:
Does anyone know how to create the dropdown menu on this site
(rollover the Artist selection in the main nav):
http://www.islandrecords.com
I'm guessing that this is some sort of styled/modified suckerfish
dropdown but I haven't been able to find out how to
Hi Scott-
Here's what I got: http://johnjlee.net/test/working_example_suckerfish.html
Can you tell me what I'm missing here?
Thanks for your help.
John
On 5/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, they aren't exactly doing it with lists. Essentially they have 6
divs that
I am converting to css an old page where I used a table.
First row - top : the logo
Second row: Three large thumbnails
Third ow: Two large thumbnails
I will now put all the above into a center column.
I am having trouble keeping the thumbnails in order into that column! :)
TIA
Do you have URL's you could show us of:
1) What you're trying to replicate (the old tables version)
2) Your current attempt.
They would be very helpful for us to get a clearer picture of what's going on.
Thanks,
Brian
__
On May 21, 2007, at 2:13 PM, faramineux wrote:
I am converting to css an old page where I used a table.
First row - top : the logo
Second row: Three large thumbnails
Third ow: Two large thumbnails
I will now put all the above into a center column.
I am having trouble keeping the
Here's the problem: I have a container div with 1 content div inside;
the content div has a variable height; the container div needs to
have a a border. How do you style this in order to work in FF2.0?
In IE6, works fine, but in FF the container div doesn't expand
vertically to the height of the
Forgot to mention that inside the container div I have 2 content divs
[not one as described below]. Both are float: left;
When there's only one content div... no problem, but with 2, or even
1 float: left; the container div collapses in FF.
Thanks, and sorry about the double post.
Ara G.
---
I'm looking for a CSS option like one of these on these non-CSS menus on
the Adobe exchange. I need the menu to be vertical and open and close to
show options in some way without being a fly out menu. I also am looking
for a bug free menu that works in as many browsers as possible.
I found the
AG wrote:
Forgot to mention that inside the container div I have 2 content divs
[not one as described below]. Both are float: left;
When there's only one content div... no problem, but with 2, or even
1 float: left; the container div collapses in FF.
Thanks, and sorry about the double post.
Thanks Jim, works fine now.
Ara G.
--- James Gadrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AG wrote:
Forgot to mention that inside the container div I have 2 content
divs
[not one as described below]. Both are float: left;
When there's only one content div... no problem, but with 2, or
even
1
On 5/21/07, Rosemary Probert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean it's a good idea to add display:block to all floated
images? Are there any drawbacks?
I have used this on various occasions with inline elements, like span,
a for example, to be able to make navigations that would normally
Hi Chris,
You should give neither html or body width and height. They will
always expand as far as the content flows. So better put width/height
to the element inside html, body.
The problem you will encounter though, is that height: 100% will not
always work as intended. Some browsers will
In another thread I saw a note reproduced below suggesting use of a
clearing div. I have seen clearing divs with and without a non-breading
space nbsp
What browsers require the nbsp to make this work correctly?
James Gadrow wrote:
To fix this add a clearing element below your content divs
Afternoon Dova
I'm looking for a CSS option like one of these on these non-CSS menus on
the Adobe exchange. I need the menu to be vertical and open and close to
show options in some way without being a fly out menu. I also am looking
for a bug free menu that works in as many browsers as
The clearing div, should if possible not contain any letter, or HTML
element at all, but some browsers, specifically IE 6 and lower will
try to apply, default line-height, font-size and so on, although there
is no content present, meaning that the clearing div will then occupy
some space and so
I would greatly appreciate it if the folks on this list could help me with a
couple of problems in the following layout:
http://www.identitysciences.com/layouts/test.htmlhttp://www.identitysciences.com/layouts/test.html
In Firefox and Safari, all seems well. In IE7, the lower part of the
Thank you Jens for taking the time to explain further.
Does this mean it's a good idea to add display:block to all floated
images? Are there any drawbacks?
I have used this on various occasions with inline elements, like span,
a for example, to be able to make navigations that would
On 5/21/07, Bob Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Rizzi wrote:
So, my question for the list is:
why should we use css rules in this scenario instead of br tags ?
Let's call it separating content (HTML) from presentation (CSS). Use
technologies for their intended, and standards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:css-d-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom McNeer
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:53 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] Third post: Could someone please help? Text covered on
IE7, images covered on IE6
I would
On 5/21/07, Melianor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeff,
1. Images are not block elements, so applying float to them will
trigger funny experiences with some browsers. So either add display:
block to the css or build a wrapper div around the images.
2. Your clearing div is causing the space
br and br / have
no semantic value. Those are presentational markup that should never
have been in HTML.
I disagree. In terms of song lyrics, poetry, and sometimes even
mailing addresses I generally think that br is a perfectly
acceptable solution that *does* have semantic value and fulfils
Anthony,
On May 19, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Anthony Park | 29degrees wrote:
Before I resign myself to it not being possible with CSS, I thought
I'd put a little problem to the great minds on this list.
If you take a look at:
http://demo.29degrees.co.uk/highlight/
... you will see what I am
35 matches
Mail list logo
