Thanks so much, worked perfectly, didn't even need the img portions of it.
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Corey Frang wrote:
>> I'm having a few IE6 problems with my site.
>>
>> http://php.michaeltisserand.com/
>>
>> In particular, the "books" link, compare it to what firefox
>> displays. There should
Corey Frang wrote:
> I'm having a few IE6 problems with my site.
>
> http://php.michaeltisserand.com/
>
> In particular, the "books" link, compare it to what firefox displays.
> There should be room on the left for the blog link, as well as images
> floating on the right, I'm not sure why this
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
> I think I mis-wrote what i really have for markup.
>
> lets try some ascii:
Generally, a URL tells more than fragments of code and ASCII illustrations
together.
>> -DIV WRAP gradient, 150px tall begins--|
>> -margin and filler space--
Please help me! I really want to execute this design
as I've visualized and designed it. I need to be able
to place the pumpkins image as shown in the graphic
comp: www.e7flux.com/thanksgivingbuffet2.jpg. The code
and CSS can be found here: http://e7flux.com/tgb/ -
I'm not sure how to place this im
I'm having a few IE6 problems with my site.
http://php.michaeltisserand.com/
In particular, the "books" link, compare it to what firefox displays.
There should be room on the left for the blog link, as well as images
floating on the right, I'm not sure why this stuff isn't showing up and
woul
Hi Elli,
Someone may know a more eloquent way but I'd write up an individual
class for each and then do the placement in the style sheet.
Regards
Vicki
At 05:08 AM 23/10/2007, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm working on a design that's visually rich and uses
>a few background images as well
> I just ran into a *serious* issue in Safari 2.0 using this hack
> (*property:value)
> I had to switch to selector, (property:value) but I'd like to know if I
> missed anything(?) I thought that filter was *safe* to use.
As a follow up:
selector (*property:value) fails
but
selector (*property:v
Hi all,
I just ran into a *serious* issue in Safari 2.0 using this hack
(*property:value)
I had to switch to selector, (property:value) but I'd like to know if I
missed anything(?) I thought that filter was *safe* to use.
Thanks
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
__
On Oct 24, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Kevin Stevens wrote:
> Oh, this is really annoying me now! I have tried the above tip (thanks
> David) which makes a lot of sense, but the div is positioned
> differently in
> the 3 browsers I have tried it in, i.e. Safari 3.03 (Windows), IE 7
> and
> FireFox 2.0.
> Try in ruleset #main_map img changing position: relative; to position:
> absolute; and defining both the height and width of the map?
Oh, this is really annoying me now! I have tried the above tip (thanks
David) which makes a lot of sense, but the div is positioned differently in
the 3 browse
> I think I mis-wrote what i really have for markup.
> If I set the h1 to have a bg color, such as the #006 suggested to match
> the dark blue, then it stands out and blocks the gradient.
> Effectively, i need a transparent background on the h1 when images are
> on, but a #006 when images are
Hi Brian,
why would you not set the dark blue background on the div itsself?
Cheers,
jens
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.yalf.de
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> h1 { color: #006; background: #fff; }
>
> If you only set background for the enclosing div, then most of the time the
> h1 will have a transparent background and things will be OK. But why take
> chances when there is nothing to be won? Some day the page might be viewed
Kevin Evans wrote:
> I am having trouble with the navigation at the top on http://
> www.websconsult.com/hopper/site/home.html in Explorer.
>
> In Explorer 7, the background color does not show up at al, get a
> whitespace, but the link hover correctly.
>
> In Explorer 6, the background shows up
Well, thanks for your help. Your advice will surely help me in
the future. Now I have learned that prescious rule of css:
"Never assume the problem is where you see it."
My menu padding moved the picture... thanks for your help!
Rickus
>Rickus wrote:
> > Hi, I am not sure why, but when I work wit
Good afternoon David,
It was foretold that on 23/10/2007 @ 13:33:42 GMT-0400 (which was
14:33:42 where I live) David Laakso would write:
Luc> I haven't had the time yet to study your alteration but i noticed you
Luc> removed the background from the body. Ah... also a hasLayout problem?
Dav
Luc wrote:
> Good afternoon David,
>
> It was foretold that on 23/10/2007 @ 11:39:07 GMT-0400 (which was
> 12:39:07 where I live) David Laakso would write:
>
>
>
>
>> That cow is going to send all of us to the psych ward: how's she feel
>> about this?
>>
>
> Lol yeah i alreday
Luc wrote:
> Somehow i'm forced to set a width on my contentwrapper: no width or a
> width of 100% cuts off the #contentright and the background image i
> had on my header when resizing to smaller screen resolution. I'm
> wondering if this is normal behaviour?
>
>
> http://www.dzinelabs.
>
> This is the trouble line: Les mer
> For an anchor tag to take effect, it has to have the href="" attribute
> set, otherwise the link won't fire and it seems that IE6 isn't
> acknowledging your tags without href, hence your lack of :hover
> effects. The :hover shows up fine in IE7, btw.
>
> Hop
Here is a snippet from your code:
IT-hoder til de tøffeste prosjektene
ita miratur laudeque poetas
Les mer
This is the trouble line: Les mer
For an anchor tag to take effect, it has to have the href="" attribute
set, otherwise the link won't fire and it seems that IE6 isn't
ackno
Hello,
I am having trouble with the navigation at the top on http://
www.websconsult.com/hopper/site/home.html in Explorer.
In Explorer 7, the background color does not show up at al, get a
whitespace, but the link hover correctly.
In Explorer 6, the background shows up but the links do not t
> This fix works (yay!) - but now I notice another oddity. IE and FF
apparently disagree as to where the link's location begins
First, I'd change the Doctype you're using ()
Now, if you want the SPAN to "escape" the image, regardless of its
dimensions, then style your image using "display:block",
Thanks, but in the real app that won't work; there's a whole array of
thumbnails, and (a) they might shift, and (b) the idea was to make
adding/changing notes for each picture easy, which means the text has to stay
in a text file. Nice idea though, and VERY fast response!
---
At 9:32 PM -0400 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm doing yet another do-it-yourself-Flickr-slideshow app for my
>site, based on code from lots of other sources.
>One feature I added was to have notes for each picture, in a simple
>text file (as opposed to on Flickr), where they can be tai
Ian Bethune wrote:
> So far I did what you said and have only gotten 1 column to work. I have
> tried many different things but nothing has worked. I did figure out why it
> wasn't calling the gif in the first place as I had made an error in the
> code. Once I fixed it, it started to work. But I ca
I'm having problems getting a link working IE6. The "Les mer" links in the
two top elements in the right column won't respond to any :hover or clicking
or similar. I've tried adding hasLayout with no luck. Removing the container
div's background .png also doesn't make any difference. I'm very ready
So far I did what you said and have only gotten 1 column to work. I have
tried many different things but nothing has worked. I did figure out why it
wasn't calling the gif in the first place as I had made an error in the
code. Once I fixed it, it started to work. But I can get the right side to
go
Greetings!
I'm trying to make transparent backgrounds for DIVs work across different
browsers without the child elements inheriting the transparency. Following a
suggestion I found in the archives I used a small PNG file tiled as the
background as a standard method, then-- since I was already usin
>Add...
>#content p a {margin-top: -100px; padding-top: 100px; width: 1px;
.display: block;}
>...and the anchor will appear 100px below top of window and nicely below
>the fixed header.
>The anchor is actually around 115px tall and 1px wide with this styling,
>but that won't bother any of the br
> Umm. Shouldn't that be 'vertical-align: bottom;' Kenny?
Wow. Remind me not to post while sleep deprived.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.inc
Jukka K. Korpela a écrit :
> It's safer to set the properties for the h1 element, e.g.
>
> h1 { color: #006; background: #fff; }
>
> If you only set background for the enclosing div, then most of the time the
> h1 will have a transparent background and things will be OK. But why take
> chances wh
This fix works (yay!) - but now I notice another oddity. IE and FF apparently
disagree as to where the link's location begins. In FF, the link (as shown by
the BG color and the position of the SPAN) "starts" about 1 text line above the
bottom of the image (although the whole images _is_ active
Éric Vesque wrote:
>> dark blue background image gradient.
>> on top of it, styled white to be readable
>>
- -
> Just add:
>
> background-color: (whatever color you want);
>
> to the properties of your div; this should do it.
It's safer to set the properties for the h1 element, e.g.
h1 { colo
Great!? I've put in a red BG on hover, just so I can see it happen in FF, will
check it when I get to work.? This "dummy" rule sounds vaguely familiar now...?
another little bug courtesy of IE, I guess?
---
Mark Wilson, Computer Programming Unlimite
Hi All,
Perhaps this is more an accessibility questions than CSS, but the fix
lies in the css i believe.
Scenario:
dark blue background image gradient.
on top of it, styled white to be readable
Now, when images are off, the text is white on white (on an assumed not
user-styled browser win
Brian Cummiskey a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> Perhaps this is more an accessibility questions than CSS, but the fix
> lies in the css i believe.
>
> Scenario:
>
> dark blue background image gradient.
> on top of it, styled white to be readable
>
>
>
> Now, when images are off, the text is white on wh
36 matches
Mail list logo
