Re: [css-d] nested lists and absolute positioning and Internet Explorer

Thanks Philippe. Haste makes waste, as they say. My apologies to the list for not taking more care to double check my markup. Corrections made. Jim > > > Your html mark-up is invalid. And what Gecko, WebKit, Opera show is > correct, given your mark-up. > >

Re: [css-d] nested lists and absolute positioning and Internet Explorer

On Dec 19, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Jim Davis wrote: > Patrick, > > I created a test page at http://www.jimdavis.org/test/listtest.html > using > your css and my html for the nested lists. > > According to Eric's book, "Cascading Style Sheets 2.0" display: > none "The > element will generate no boxe

Re: [css-d] nested lists and absolute positioning and Internet Explorer

Patrick, I created a test page at http://www.jimdavis.org/test/listtest.html using your css and my html for the nested lists. According to Eric's book, "Cascading Style Sheets 2.0" display: none "The element will generate no boxes at all and thus will neither be displayed nor impact the layout of

[css-d] nested lists and absolute positioning and Internet Explorer

I am able to display this correctly in Firefox but IE6 and IE7 won't display the top:property correctly. I have 3 nested unordered lists. 1st one display inline 2nd one display block 3rd one display inline 2nd and 3rd lists only display when container list is hovered and the 2nd list has a back

Re: [css-d] Internet Explorer

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:13:50 +0900, JonMarc Wright wrote: [...] > > the pages are located at: > > http://dearcards.com/dt/index.html > > css can be found at > > http://dearcards.com/dt/css/base.css > > there is some extra markup in the form of some extra divs and stuff, which is > intentional and i

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

> On 17/12/2007, Bob Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: >> Is it permissible to use root relative addresses in the background statement? >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:50:12 +, David Dorward wrote: > > Relative URIs in stylesheets are relative to the stylesheet, not the HTML > document that > incl

Re: [css-d] Sub menus stick in IE7

> I am having a problem with my main navigation (#nav) in which the > drop-down menus do not hide on mouse out (sometimes). Basically IE7 Hi, below code taken from on of my suckerfish variations: ul#hNav li:hover, ul#hNav li.over { position: static; } /* Fix for IE7. */ That fixed the "stick" in

Re: [css-d] general css structure and positioning questions

Ron Zisman wrote: > http://www.ricochet.org/ricotest/ricotest.html > > a number of additions and questions > > this generally looks close to what i think i want. when you first > land, there will only be the first column of menu options > after selecting choice, a sub-directory presents, and a

Re: [css-d] a lost web page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am in the process of creating a new web page. It works fine in Internet > explorer 6, but it seems that the css file is > not read in internet explorer 7 and Vista. > > I am somewhat new web pages and I have no idea what to look for. > Can anyone give me suggestions on

Re: [css-d] a lost web page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > I am in the process of creating a new web page. It works fine in Internet > explorer 6, but it seems that the css file is > not read in internet explorer 7 and Vista. > > I am somewhat new web pages and I have no idea what to look for. > Can anyone give me suggestions

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

Bob, I have used root relative addresses without any problems. tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Cohen Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:27 PM To: CSS-Discuss List Subject: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL Is it permissible

[css-d] a lost web page

I am in the process of creating a new web page. It works fine in Internet explorer 6, but it seems that the css file is not read in internet explorer 7 and Vista. I am somewhat new web pages and I have no idea what to look for. Can anyone give me suggestions on what to look for or where I am migh

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

On Dec 17, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Your syntax '/img/bg_2.gif' should work correctly, assuming that the > folder and the image are there where they should be: a folder child > of the root folder on the server. > > When I check > http://mojotools.com/img/bg_2.gif > I

[css-d] Internet Explorer

Hey everyonedid some work on a site recently, had it modified and bounced around a bit, just got it back with a request to fix it in internet explorer, as right now it looks nothing like it does in firefox. doesn't have any browser specific style sheets at the moment or any hacks or filters.

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

On 17/12/2007, Bob Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it permissible to use root relative addresses in the background > statement? Of course. > The display breaks in CSSEdit's previewer and when I check the file in > Firefox locally. Root relative URIs don't really work outside the context of