[css-d] IE6 input type=image sizing issue

Hi, we got the problem that IE6 is not getting the image size of buttons correct when loading them first time. A normal refresh by F5 or Ctrl+F5 does not help either, but revisiting the page does. The buttons get width:auto; height:auto; from CSS, having it fixed isn't really an option. FF,

Re: [css-d] IE6 input type=image sizing issue

Hello, search for the thread [css-d] Disappearing images and min-height from 2008-05-05. There Georg wrote: IE6 (and older) can't auto-size images reliably. Locally all images will be loaded so fast that there won't be a problem, but IE6 will time out on most connections, and the more images

Re: [css-d] IE6 input type=image sizing issue

Thx, that explains the issue and removing width:auto;height:auto; solves it so far. Just with the backdraw that we got to add a class to other inputs for setting the default width then. Regards, Paul 2008/5/14 Christian Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, search for the thread [css-d]

Re: [css-d] FW: Map remote css directory to local directory

Ok, thanks will do. -Original Message- From: David Hucklesby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 May 2008 06:01 To: Oliver Secluna; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: Re: [css-d] FW: Map remote css directory to local directory On Tue, 13 May 2008 15:22:55 +0100, Oliver Secluna wrote:

[css-d] Absolute positioning, off-screen positioning and scrollbars

Hi, I'm wondering if someone could point out where in the spec the following behaviour is defined. If I use absolute positioning to position an element off the left-hand side of the screen, I don't get any scroll bars: body div style=position:absolute;left:-100em;border:1px solid

Re: [css-d] Absolute positioning, off-screen positioning and scrollbars

Chris Hardie wrote: Hi, I'm wondering if someone could point out where in the spec the following behaviour is defined. If I use absolute positioning to position an element off the left-hand side of the screen, I don't get any scroll bars: body div

Re: [css-d] Absolute positioning, off-screen positioning and scrollbars

And I presume because when the left attribute is assigned a negative value, the calculation of the canvas's width is not increased, so scroll bars are not added? Though it is taken out of the normal flow, it is still painted on the canvas (CSS 2.1: 2.3.1: the space where the formatting

Re: [css-d] Absolute positioning, off-screen positioning and scrollbars

Chris Hardie wrote: And I presume because when the left attribute is assigned a negative value, the calculation of the canvas's width is not increased, so scroll bars are not added? Though it is taken out of the normal flow, it is still painted on the canvas (CSS 2.1: 2.3.1: the space

Re: [css-d] Absolute positioning, off-screen positioning and scrollbars

Chris Hardie wrote: And I presume because when the left attribute is assigned a negative value, the calculation of the canvas's width is not increased, so scroll bars are not added? The fact is that browsers decided to providing horizontal scrolling to one side only - the right side, because

[css-d] image jumping container

Hey All, I have a design that uses the negative margin technique to have a three column layout (http://www.baseballtriviaquiz.com/bpg/) that seems to be working across browsers in windows. I have a second page that is two column at the top and three column at the bottom. The content in the

Re: [css-d] image jumping container

Hi Scot, Whenever I have troubles like this, a technique that usually helps me is by applying border to elements. You could try applying a border with a different colour to each of the elements in that particular part of the page, or you could do something brutish like: #content *{

[css-d] i'm having a nightmare with z-index and links

unfortunately i have no URL to show as it's an intranet but my problem is this: i have a 'dropdown' that when visible has a z-index of 2 that overlaps a DIV with no z-index set but is appearing above the 'dropdowns' (in IE anyway). easy to fix by putting a z-index of -1 on the offending DIV. the

Re: [css-d] i'm having a nightmare with z-index and links

vincent pollard wrote: i have a 'dropdown' that when visible has a z-index of 2 that overlaps a DIV with no z-index set but is appearing above the 'dropdowns' (in IE anyway). easy to fix by putting a z-index of -1 on the offending DIV. the trouble with that is that our print function

[css-d] Internet Explorer Loses List Item Types When List Item is Floated

We are trying to create a columns of list items with the following HTML: ul liItem/li liItem/li liItem/li etc. /ul and CSS: ul { margin:0 0 1em 2em; list-style-position:outside; } li { float:left; width:33%; } The columns form as we wanted, but IE loses the

[css-d] CSS writing style question

Hey list, question here on what is correct or not. We have a document online and to get it to format correctly when printed someone came up with this tag: Inline p style=page-break-after:always/p But I have also seen it in a CSS file like this: CSS p{ page-break-before: always; } Is it

Re: [css-d] i'm having a nightmare with z-index and links

ingo, you're a genius. thank you so much. i'd tried altering the z-index of the 'dropdown' but not the div that contains it. i didn't think that would make a difference. thanks again! vince 2008/5/14 Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED]: vincent pollard wrote: i have a 'dropdown' that when visible has

Re: [css-d] Internet Explorer Loses List Item Types When List Item is Floated

Hi Bryce, The solution I often opt for requires a bit more work, but it usually ends up being more resilient across browsers. Instead of using a bullet, use a background image that poses as a bullet. Your style would look something like: |**li { padding-left: 1em; /* This should be the width

[css-d] negative absolute positioning bad for SEO?

i've been using negative absolute positioning on text that i want hidden, but need to be accessible to alternate devices. someone has suggested that the text won't be seen by bots (like google) so it won't be processed and can't be utilized for SEO purposes. in your experience is this

Re: [css-d] Internet Explorer Loses List Item Types When List Item is Floated

Bryce Fields wrote: We are trying to create a columns of list items with the following HTML: [snipped] The columns form as we wanted, but IE loses the list item bullet when the list item is floated. We've found links to articles illustrating the problem, but no one has a nice, semantic

Re: [css-d] Text Wrap around Floated Div

On 14/05/2008, Bobby Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're right here. Although David raised the legality issue, a div within a list item is perfectly valid (floated or not), and this equivalent of your original does render as expected (as I understand it, i.e. the same as the

Re: [css-d] Internet Explorer Loses List Item Types When List Item is Floated

Bryce Fields wrote: The columns form as we wanted, but IE loses the list item bullet when the list item is floated. We've found links to articles illustrating the problem, but no one has a nice, semantic solution. Anyone know what's going on and how we can fix it? I know from nothing

Re: [css-d] negative absolute positioning bad for SEO?

On Wed, 14 May 2008 14:51:05 -0600, Brian Campbell wrote: i've been using negative absolute positioning on text that i want hidden, but need to be accessible to alternate devices. someone has suggested that the text won't be seen by bots (like google) so it won't be processed and can't be

Re: [css-d] negative absolute positioning bad for SEO?

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Brian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've been using negative absolute positioning on text that i want hidden, but need to be accessible to alternate devices. someone has suggested that the text won't be seen by bots (like google) so it won't be processed

[css-d] help with 4 column css

I'm trying to write a 4-column page and content in center columns is sliding under side columns. also - banner is sliding around when page is resized. help, please. I'm new to CSS and struggling. thanks! http://www2.whidbey.com/cflax/nwbaby_test/index.html -- Carol Flax [EMAIL PROTECTED]