Can anybody recommend any lists as good as css-d (sycophant! sycophant!)
for lurking about JavaScript, PHP, MySQL, and Apache? Oh, just the
whole damn AJAX thingy!
Regards,
Hedley
--
Hedley Finger
28 Regent Street Camberwell VIC 3124 Australia
Tel. +61 3 9809 1229 Fax. (call phone fir
On Oct 9, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Michael Adams wrote:
> I have grown so fond of this technique that i have thought of
> extending
> both it and @media in a new direction. If browsers were seen as a
> type of media you could legally write fixes for any CSS issue in a
> given browser. The technique w
Denise McLaurin wrote:
> I'm experiencing a problem with a left-hand menu that
> uses css to hide/display submenu items on a particular
> page which gives certain content items a z-index setting.
> The problem is corrected in Firefox by adding a higher
z-index to the submenu s. However, this doe
I am currently using the @import browser hack for IE that i first read
about here:
http://annevankesteren.nl/2005/10/ie-import-hack
I have grown so fond of this technique that i have thought of extending
both it and @media in a new direction. If browsers were seen as a
type of media you could leg
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:39:17 -0600, Jack Blankenships wrote:
> How does that "kill the child?" If the link has display: none, why does that
> have any
> effect whatsoever on the clickability or the link or the resulting action?
> Doesn't
> display none simply not show it on the page but allow it
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:41:17 -0700, John Biggs wrote:
[...]
>
> I am using a CSS/Javascript-based design for my left-nav menu, incorporating
> pop-out
> menus for lower level lists. However, the popouts (menu buttons with blue
> right
> border) are only occurring under IE7. I have done what I co
Jack Blankenships wrote:
> How does that "kill the child?" If the link has display: none, why
> does that have any effect whatsoever on the clickability or the link
> or the resulting action? Doesn't display none simply not show it on
> the page but allow it to exist in the DOM?
You can no long
Bill Moseley wrote:
> Question:
>
> What's the best way to move text off screen and allow a background
> image to still show? And done with accessibility in mind?
>
Answer:
Sorry, but from what I've seen there is no _good_ way to do this, with
current standards and implementations.
Y
How does that "kill the child?" If the link has display: none, why
does that have any effect whatsoever on the clickability or the link
or the resulting action? Doesn't display none simply not show it on
the page but allow it to exist in the DOM?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.constructweb.com/seo/
>
> It validates! - anything else that be suggested from the css/html (maybe
> SEO if it's not too OT) perspective that would make this page even more
> web standards compliant?
>
> Thanks
> Neal
>
>
>
As far as the Web Standards stuf
apologize for the cross post.
I created a page (pages) for a client and they will be used mostly for SEO
This is the (very simple) page:
http://www.constructweb.com/seo/
It validates! - anything else that be suggested from the css/html (maybe
SEO if it's not too OT) perspective that would make th
You can try the following
For SEO purposes try display: none on the text span, SEO bots will take it,
others wont
Or you can use the text-indent property and set it to something like
-2000px;
OR you can set the text with a font-size1 and make the text have the same
color as the background image (th
Jack Blankenships wrote:
> I want to make it so that an active link makes the parent element
> disappear. The element does disappear when I place an :active
> pseudo-class on the parent element to change the display to none,
> however the link ceases to function (i.e. - clicking on it does
> n
I want to make it so that an active link makes the parent element
disappear. The element does disappear when I place an :active
pseudo-class on the parent element to change the display to none,
however the link ceases to function (i.e. - clicking on it does
nothing).
Working example: http://www.c
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This is my first post to this forum. I have gained a lot of insight and
knowledge reading your posts here, so I'm hopeful I may get some input on
a problem I am having with my website.
I am using a CSS/Javascript-based design for my left-nav menu,
incorporating pop-out m
About 90% of the time I do the border-top:0 method, but I have found myself
using the 0 1 1 1 method as well.
I don't really see anything wrong with it.
Maybe in the future we'll have: border:0 1px 1px 1px solid blue;
__
css-disc
You can also do this way:
div.className {
border:solid 1px #91a7b4;
border-width:0 1px 1px 1px; /* T R B L (easily remembered as Trouble) */
}
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Pollard
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 200
Generally when I want borders on 3 sides of something I write:
div.className {
border-top: 0;
border-right: solid 1px #91a7b4;
border-bottom: solid 1px #91a7b4;
border-left: solid 1px #91a7b4;
}
But I'm wondering if the following is better:
div.className {
bord
Page in question:
http://hank.org/image.html
Question:
What's the best way to move text off screen and allow a background
image to still show? And done with accessibility in mind?
I've been messing with this for a while today and now ask for help. ;)
I have javascript that finds
I'm experiencing a problem with a left-hand menu that uses css to
hide/display submenu items on a particular page which gives certain
content items a z-index setting. The problem is corrected in Firefox by
adding a higher z-index to the submenu s. However, this does not
work in IE.
If someon
Hi *Peter,
I am new member and I am still finding my feet in this forum.
I happen to have a similar problem, have tried everything and even though I
am just a placement student , the professional staff doesn't know how to
deal with this as well.
so I created this website and no matter whether I
21 matches
Mail list logo
