On 2009-02-16 Iain Wilson wrote:
>Hi All
>
>New to this CSS world but loving it.
>
>I have seen many examples of tableless forms such as that at Dynamic Drive -
>CSS Library
[snip]
>However, I cannot find anything that works with ASP.NET components such
>
>, etc.
>
>Is it possible to do the same
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:58:25 -0800
Came this utterance fomulated by Ryan Little @ Gusto to my mailbox:
> >
> > Not really sure how relevant browser statistic are regarding the
> > practical application of CSS. Nevertheless, there was a very long
> > thread
> > last month, on somewhat related mat
cFA wrote:
> So let's say I take the route as noted above and I fix the bug by
> using this html:
>
> div id = eventsModule
>
> and the css
>
> #eventsModule - margin bottom 5px
>
> This change has broken backwards compatibility right?
From what you wrote I can't see what backwards compatib
RHYAN TAYLOR wrote:
> The site is *http://www.freestyle-la.net* Everything is great until
> you use Internet Explorer 6 or 7.
Delete the 'clear: both;' on .TabbedPanels, as IE7 and older don't
support the CSS that keeps that 'clear' from clearing the sidebar.
> Notes:
>
> I changed from 'Tra
On 2009/02/17 19:45 (GMT-0600) Brian Funk composed:
> With regard to
> respecting users settings it seems more important to create in a way
> that the text /can/ be scalable to let them do what they want with it -
> hopefully without breaking your page design. Some ways of sizing prevent
> thi
On 2009/02/17 21:59 (GMT-0500) Ron Koster composed:
> the font sizes/proportions/percentages that David mentioned earlier...
> At 10:02 AM 2/13/2009 -0800, David Hucklesby wrote:
>>I find that these percentages work best
>>cross-browser: 69%, 75%, 82%, 94% ... with a base font-size of 100%.
> .
At 07:45 PM 2/17/2009 -0600, Brian Funk wrote:
>The 100% is needed as a base to avoid problems in certain browsers -
>others can explain this in detail far better than I. With regard to
>respecting users settings it seems more important to create in a way
>that the text /can/ be scalable to let
Hi all, I'm trying to get some strategy nailed down so that I can more
effectively fix bugs where I work. A lot of what we do needs to be
backwards compatible. I've got access to the html and sometimes I've
updated (changed) classes or removed classes from existing markup in order
to fix bugs.
Pe
Ron Koster wrote:
> At 10:02 AM 2/13/2009 -0800, David Hucklesby wrote:
>> I find that these percentages work best
>> cross-browser: 69%, 75%, 82%, 94% ... with a base font-size of 100%.
> Firstly, from past threads, my understanding is that one shouldn't be
> going any smaller than 100% -- or at
I'm a beginner to CSS. So be gentle. I designed a site for a good friend
and have published it to the web.
The site is *http://www.freestyle-la.net* Everything is great until you
use Internet Explorer 6 or 7.
Some pages, pages with Spry elements, like tabbed panels and accordions, are
being forc
At 10:02 AM 2/13/2009 -0800, David Hucklesby wrote:
>I find that these percentages work best
>cross-browser: 69%, 75%, 82%, 94% ... with a base font-size of 100%.
Interesting. As an avid typophile -- and someone who still,
admittedly, has a lot to learn about CSS -- I've been trying to
follow an
On 2009/02/17 17:13 (GMT-0600) RePost composed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> To amplify David's original implication and subsequent response, use of px
>> for sizing text is an affirmative design choice that whatever text sizes are
>> acceptable to or preferred by the design's visitors are utterly irr
* RePost wrote:
>> A corollary is px for setting line height.
>> http://fm.no-ip.com/auth/line-height-inherit.html demonstrates how it can be
>> a problem.
>>
>Felix, I don't quite get this "Use only for line-height"
>business proposed at the link you provided.
>
>If your "number" is neither p
Felix Miata wrote:
> To amplify David's original implication and subsequent response, use of px
> for sizing text is an affirmative design choice that whatever text sizes are
> acceptable to or preferred by the design's visitors are utterly irrelevant.
> Whatever size in px seems most appropriate t
Christopher R wrote:
> I appreciate the help David very much, I would just like to know with what I
> have designed how I could fix that cut off that happens with IE6?
>
>
>
>>> www.thecreativesheep.ca/page_error/imagepage3b.html
>>>
We know what you want. And over many moons, many fol
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Bill Brown wrote:
> christi...@netscape.net wrote:
> > It seems to be a little-known fact that the W3C actually says that
> > tables can be used to lay out (actually it says "present") forms.
> > More info here: http://developer.cmzmedia.com/?p=71
> > Yes, tab
christi...@netscape.net wrote:
> It seems to be a little-known fact that the W3C actually says that
> tables can be used to lay out (actually it says "present") forms.
> More info here: http://developer.cmzmedia.com/?p=71
> Yes, tables were not intended to lay out a whole web page but they do
Thank you! This was exactly the thing -- I thought I'd done this and
obviously hadn't.
Sorry my thanks are so late; I really appreciate your help.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Kir Talmage wrote:
>
>> All is well in most current browsers, but IE6 is pushing the paragr
It seems to be a little-known fact that the W3C actually says that tables can
be used to lay out (actually it says "present") forms.
More info here: http://developer.cmzmedia.com/?p=71
Yes, tables were not intended to lay out a whole web page but they do have
legitimate uses. There's no need to
Christopher R wrote:
> www.thecreativesheep.ca/page_error/imagepage3b.html
>
> I'm having a problem with an element on this page the "class.myface" when
> compared in IE7/FF/etc it looks fine
> but when you view it in IE6 the "class.myface" block element is scaled
> bigger, I've been trying to fi
I appreciate the help David very much, I would just like to know with what I
have designed how I could fix that cut off that happens with IE6?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM "David Laakso"
wrote:
>Christopher R wrote:
> > www.thecreativesheep.ca/page_error/imagepage3b.html
> >
> > I'm havin
Hi Jason,
You can reply to the person and/or the list.
I prefer to copy the list in "reply to all" so that everyone else
knows the answer plus it'll become a common knowledge pool.
Ta,
~Mx
http://www.mxdx.co.uk
2009/2/17 Jason Newington :
> Hi there,
>
> New to the list so not sure whether I
Ryan,
Be sure you are looking at the browser stats in the wider context of the
site's purpose and audience reach. For my personal sites, I abandoned IE6 a
year ago, but I get very few visitors. 20% of visitors to my personal site
only account for a couple a day.
On sites I build for clients who
Hi there,
New to the list so not sure whether I should reply to the list or to the
person individually, would be grateful if someone could tell me :)
Just spent a little bit of time looking at your problem and it's being
caused by the tag sitting inside .mayface.
If you move the tag outside o
Yeah I see it's only caused in IE6, you can't even horizontal scroll to get it
to center, I'm not to sure.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:19 AM "Martyn Merrett"
wrote:
>Possibly something to do with the Box model bug in IE6?
> You are right it does happen here too.
>
> One warning on this page -
Possibly something to do with the Box model bug in IE6?
You are right it does happen here too.
One warning on this page - I can see a lot of absolute positioning.
Try resizing your browser (say to 800x600) and you'll notice the
content doesn't move and you can only see half the page!
~Mx
http://w
www.thecreativesheep.ca/page_error/imagepage3b.html
I'm having a problem with an element on this page the "class.myface" when
compared in IE7/FF/etc it looks fine
but when you view it in IE6 the "class.myface" block element is scaled bigger,
I've been trying to figure this out for a day or two
I
Hi Martyn,
I saw that in my internet searches, but it doesn't work in IE6, and
unfortunately, the projects I am working on all still use IE6. I
don't object to using Javascript and CSS to style the tag,
but I wanted to see if I missed anything about a CSS-only solution.
So far, I have found no ev
A side note to IE6. I just bought my dad a brand new Dell mini
computer and guess what, it came with IE6 installed! I was a bit
perturbed at this...
Nancy
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Ryan Little @ Gusto
wrote:
>>
>> Not really sure how relevant browser statistic are regarding the
>> practi
> I found this CSS only hack to allow a pretty select menu with no JavaScript.
> http://pennypacker.net/articles/css_tricks_select_menu
> It works okay in FF3 but falls back to the default in IE6.
>
yeah works okay in FF3 but you can't see the item you select.
i'm sure there's a way to do it in cs
> New to this CSS world but loving it.
>
> I have seen many examples of tableless forms such as that at Dynamic Drive -
> CSS Library
>
> http://www.dynamicdrive.com/style/csslibrary/item/css-tableless-form/P10/
>
>
> However, I cannot find anything that works with ASP.NET components such
>
> , et
Hi Steve,
I found this CSS only hack to allow a pretty select menu with no JavaScript.
http://pennypacker.net/articles/css_tricks_select_menu
It works okay in FF3 but falls back to the default in IE6.
Is an input value for a form?
~Mx
http://www.mxdx.co.uk
2009/2/17 Stephen Tang :
> Blake,
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
