Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ib Jensen wrote: > 2009/5/20 David Laakso : > >> Ib Jensen wrote: >> > > >> Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the >> missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be >> that neither of the more important content images in the ri

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009/5/20 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: >> >> 2009/5/20 David Laakso : >>> >>> Ib Jensen wrote: > This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS > file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 "conditional comment." It will > work either way. > * html div#side {width:9

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009/5/20 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: >> > Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the > missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?),  may be > that neither of the more important content images in the right column, > reside in their respectiv

Re: [css-d] Displaying/Simulating "handwritten" fonts on notebook paper

Chris, Ryan, Thanks for your kind words! CSS offers many possibilities, but in some cases it would be nice if it had more specific properties and control to avoid recurring to tricks, which frequently have a dark side :-) In this case, at least the javascript should be made more robust before usin