2009/5/20 David Laakso <da...@chelseacreekstudio.com>: > Ib Jensen wrote: >>
> Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the > missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be > that neither of the more important content images in the right column, > reside in their respective containers in IE/6. . Apart from that the Template was _not made_ for IE6, I would like it to behave nice. About the icons, They don't matter, but if they _could_ be shown .... > And, if push came shove, I'd consider setting a fixed width of 990px on the > page outermost wrapper for IE/6.0 (only). This will prevent the float drop > in narrow windows, in IE/6. And, it will resolve that IE/6 does not support > min/max width. That should then be in a CC in the header or in a ie.css ? > I do not know, as well, why you need be particularly concerned with the > "zoom" toy in IE. Unless you are willing to start from scratch with a > different layout concept, it may be beneficial to accept IE's "zoom toy" for > what it is: *page "zoom." * I was just testing how it behaved in a large size, but should problably instead have used browsershot.com? to test it in. -- Regards / Mhv. Ib K. jensen - http://ikjensen.dk ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
