Re: [css-d] Site Check

2009-10-06 Thread Felix Miata
On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed: > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the > layout should be good across

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2009-10-06 Thread David Laakso
David McGlone wrote: > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the > layout should be good across all browsers. > > Blessings > Dav

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2009-10-06 Thread Roberto Gorjão
Hi, In IE6 it falls apart. Sidebar is pushed down below of contents and the top photo disappears. I also think that the top title lacks some contrast. The red one over the blue grayish background. HTH. Roberto David McGlone wrote: > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2009-10-06 Thread MEM
> >Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > > >I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in > the > >top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident > the > >layout should be good across all browsers. > > > >Blessings > >David M.

Re: [css-d] Universal selector vs. body selector

2009-10-06 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Ezequiel Garzón wrote: > Thank you all for your replies! They have taught me a lot in very > little > time. > > Is it possible to open the default stylesheet? Are settings such as > 'a { > color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }' de facto or formal > standard

Re: [css-d] Site Check

2009-10-06 Thread Louise Olson
Hi David, I looked at it on a Mac using Opera, Firefox, and Safari. It looked fine in all three. I did notice you may have an "s" missing from your "All Right Reserved" in your footer. Site looks nice and clean. Louise On 10/6/09, David McGlone wrote: >Hi all, Can I get a site check @ htt

[css-d] Site Check

2009-10-06 Thread David McGlone
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the layout should be good across all browsers. Blessings David M.

Re: [css-d] How do I comment out a background image for IE6?

2009-10-06 Thread Thierry Koblentz
> I have a background image with alpha transparency (a drop shadow) in a > div behind my menu. IE6 doesn't support alpha transparency, as you > know. What I'd like to do is just create a style for IE6 that removes > the div's background. I'm unsure as to how to comment out for IE6, and > what I've

[css-d] How do I comment out a background image for IE6?

2009-10-06 Thread Theresa Mesa
I have a background image with alpha transparency (a drop shadow) in a div behind my menu. IE6 doesn't support alpha transparency, as you know. What I'd like to do is just create a style for IE6 that removes the div's background. I'm unsure as to how to comment out for IE6, and what I've go

Re: [css-d] Universal selector vs. body selector

2009-10-06 Thread Ezequiel Garzón
Thank you all for your replies! They have taught me a lot in very little time. Is it possible to open the default stylesheet? Are settings such as 'a { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }' de facto or formal standards? Cheers, Ezequiel

Re: [css-d] :: page review :

2009-10-06 Thread Paul Novitski
At 10/5/2009 06:42 AM, David Laakso wrote: >The initial specs for this proposal call for the 10-item top horizontal >navigation. >The clinker is it needs to be functional in Blackberry and iPhone as >well. Turning the nav to block for handheld is not a problem. But, seems >to me, it will present th

Re: [css-d] Universal selector vs. body selector

2009-10-06 Thread Bobby Jack
--- On Tue, 10/6/09, Ezequiel Garzón wrote: > Greetings. As you will be able to > tell, I'm a CSS rookie. My doubt is, > if the body contains all the other containers, why does > body { ... } > behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed > to > cascade? Inheritable properties at l

Re: [css-d] Universal selector vs. body selector

2009-10-06 Thread Climis, Tim
Greetings. As you will be able to tell, I'm a CSS rookie. My doubt is, if the body contains all the other containers, why does body { ... } behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed to cascade? Inheritable properties at least, no? But then I find that body { color:black; } and

Re: [css-d] Universal selector vs. body selector

2009-10-06 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Ezequiel Garzón wrote: > My doubt is, > if the body contains all the other containers, why does body { ... } > behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed to > cascade? Inheritable properties at least, no? But then I find that > > body { color:black; }

[css-d] Universal selector vs. body selector

2009-10-06 Thread Ezequiel Garzón
Greetings. As you will be able to tell, I'm a CSS rookie. My doubt is, if the body contains all the other containers, why does body { ... } behave different from * { ... }? Aren't properties supposed to cascade? Inheritable properties at least, no? But then I find that body { color:black; } and