Actually, an acronym is pronounced as a word, and an initialism is
not, as is my understanding.
Abbreviation: Mr.
Acronym: SCUBA
Initialism: FBI
On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:10 AM, david wrote:
> Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, david wrote:
>>
>
> No, an acronym is usually pro
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, david wrote:
>
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>>> On 2010/01/14 23:36 (GMT) Rick Duley composed:
>>>
I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I
cannot understand why.
I use APA document referencing style and I am frequen
Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2010/01/14 23:36 (GMT) Rick Duley composed:
>
>> I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I
>> cannot understand why.
>
>> I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes,
>> required, ... by the style) to underline fields in
On Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:36:50 pm Rick Duley wrote:
> I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I
> cannot understand why.
>
> I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes,
> required, ... by the style) to underline fields in a bibliographic
On 2010/01/14 23:36 (GMT) Rick Duley composed:
> I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I
> cannot understand why.
> I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes,
> required, ... by the style) to underline fields in a bibliographic reference.
>
I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I cannot
understand why.
I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes,
required, ... by the style) to underline fields in a bibliographic reference.
I find that Field is a clumsy
substitute.
Why was
ok, here's a puzzle, what could it be? the stickiness of the menu is gone in
IE7 in the code below. but remove the p tag containing the "s" and it is
sticky again! what could do this?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Suckerfish with csshov