Re: [css-d] - why did it have to die?

2010-01-14 Thread Ray Costanzo
Actually, an acronym is pronounced as a word, and an initialism is not, as is my understanding. Abbreviation: Mr. Acronym: SCUBA Initialism: FBI On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:10 AM, david wrote: > Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, david wrote: >> > > No, an acronym is usually pro

Re: [css-d] - why did it have to die?

2010-01-14 Thread david
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, david wrote: > >> Felix Miata wrote: >>> On 2010/01/14 23:36 (GMT) Rick Duley composed: >>> I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I cannot understand why. I use APA document referencing style and I am frequen

Re: [css-d] - why did it have to die?

2010-01-14 Thread david
Felix Miata wrote: > On 2010/01/14 23:36 (GMT) Rick Duley composed: > >> I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I >> cannot understand why. > >> I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes, >> required, ... by the style) to underline fields in

Re: [css-d] - why did it have to die?

2010-01-14 Thread Tim Climis
On Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:36:50 pm Rick Duley wrote: > I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I > cannot understand why. > > I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes, > required, ... by the style) to underline fields in a bibliographic

Re: [css-d] - why did it have to die?

2010-01-14 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/01/14 23:36 (GMT) Rick Duley composed: > I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I > cannot understand why. > I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes, > required, ... by the style) to underline fields in a bibliographic reference. >

[css-d] - why did it have to die?

2010-01-14 Thread Rick Duley
I am using HTML 4.01 Strict and CSS 2.1. has been exiled and I cannot understand why. I use APA document referencing style and I am frequently required (yes, required, ... by the style) to underline fields in a bibliographic reference. I find that Field is a clumsy substitute. Why was

Re: [css-d] suckerfish problem in IE7

2010-01-14 Thread Theresa Newman
ok, here's a puzzle, what could it be? the stickiness of the menu is gone in IE7 in the code below. but remove the p tag containing the "s" and it is sticky again! what could do this? http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> Suckerfish with csshov