Shanna Cramer wrote:
> I frequently work on child themes and build custom style sheets in
> addition to the parent style sheet.
> Is there a way to zero out a style? Just remove any parent styling
> that was applied to some element.
No, you cannot zero out style settings, only override them.
For
On Apr 11, 2010, at 3:34 AM, Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
> It's not clear to me what this means. Which ones of
> the following statements will be true?
>
> 1) A rule for :visited won't be used at all if
>any disallowed property is used in it.
> 2) Disallowed properties can't at all be appli
Shanna Cramer wrote:
> I frequently work on child themes and build custom style sheets in addition
> to the parent style sheet.
> Is there a way to zero out a style? Just remove any parent styling that was
> applied to some element.
>
>
Sound reasonable: sort of. Got a uri to specific problem
I frequently work on child themes and build custom style sheets in addition
to the parent style sheet.
Is there a way to zero out a style? Just remove any parent styling that was
applied to some element.
__
css-discuss [cs...@list
This css code in my external .css works to put padding on a flash object tag
in FF but nada in IE:
object {
padding-left:30px;
}
Normally I'd use another way around this but for various reasons this is my
preferred solution
Why is this not working in IE? Thanks
__
On 2010-04-10 Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> In short, those browsers will limit the ways the a:visited
> state can be styled. Color, background-color, and to some
> extend, outline, border are not affected, as long as you don't
> use alpha-transparency (rgba()), change the border-style or
> border-
On Saturday 2010-04-10 07:19 +0100, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> May I express a personal wish that this behaviour be under
> user control ? Whilst I fully understand David Baron's
> rationale for the change, I do not believe that it is the
> responsibility of browsers to work around security deficienci
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> That would probably be :focus.
More than probably.
Forgive the oversight.
--
-Jack Timmons
http://www.trotlc.com
Twitter: @codeacula
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.cs
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> May I express a personal wish that this behaviour be under
> user control ? Whilst I fully understand David Baron's
> rationale for the change, I do not believe that it is the
> responsibility of browsers to work around security deficiencies
> that arise from the correct imp
