[css-d] rounded corners problem

Hi All, http://rorybernstein.com/roundcorners/ On this page, the light blue box that surrounds the horizontal grey graphic has rounded corners with the help of a little css. It's working great in a lot of browsers, but not in IE8. I have not been able to test it on IE7 or lower yet... In IE8

[css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

Hello Gmail users, I've been seeing an increasing number of pharma-spam messages in the spam filters being sent by list members with Gmail accounts. (I've been seeing this happen in my personal inbox as well.) Fortunately, thanks to the way the spam is constructed, it's been prevented from

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

Hi Eric! my account was also affected. I've already changed my password. thanks. ^^ -- http://www.css-zibaldone.com/ http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

From: "Rory Bernstein" > Hi All, > > http://rorybernstein.com/roundcorners/ > > On this page, the light blue box that surrounds the horizontal grey graphic > has rounded corners with the help of a little css. > It's working great in a lot of browsers, but not in IE8. I have not been able > to t

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

I've been seeing similar pharma-spam on several of my Yahoo groups in the last week, but at least one has been from an AOL account. So it's not just Gmail. Val -- --- "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known" - Carl Sagan www.oakleafdesignprint.co.uk www.oa

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

On 21 April 2010 14:40, Eric A. Meyer wrote: > Hello Gmail users, > >    I've been seeing an increasing number of pharma-spam messages in > the spam filters being sent by list members with Gmail accounts. > (I've been seeing this happen in my personal inbox as well.) > Fortunately, thanks to the w

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Al Sparber wrote: > The best solution if rounded corners are a client requirement is, and will > continue to be for some time, CSS-assigned background > images. > -- > Al Sparber - PVII Thanks, Al. I've ditched all the CSS3 from the page, sticking to regular CSS

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

At 5:17 PM +0100 4/21/10, Lesley Binks wrote: >Isn't this a bit of a red herring, Eric? I have not attempted to obscure a scent trail with the use of excessively pungent salted and smoked fish, no. As there have been rising indications-- not just in my inbox, but among Gmail users over

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Eric A. Meyer wrote: > Hello Gmail users, > >    I've been seeing an increasing number of pharma-spam messages in > the spam filters being sent by list members with Gmail accounts. > (I've been seeing this happen in my personal inbox as well.) > Fortunately, thanks

Re: [css-d] IE problems - Float problem??

David Laakso wrote: > It "seems: to work this end in XP IE 6/7/8 on a Mac-- unless I have > completely misunderstood the question? PC in sick bay so can't check > it in that... > Please see: > > Thank you, David. You are, as ever, a paragon of

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

Hi Rory, > regular CSS and background images. I now have 4 new divs, one for each > corner image; each one has a little background image for the corners. > So, that's working, but I wonder can anyone take a look at my revised > code and tell me if there is an even cleaner way to do this? I am sad

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

Just had a quick look through my various Yahoo group message lists; of the five pharma-spams that I've spotted, two were from AOL addresses and three were from Yahoo addresses. So it appears that talk of any "Gmail bug" really is an aromatic dried, salted fish. Val --- "Som

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

relevant news story on Macworld http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?newsid=3221204 Peter H. __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- ht

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: > Hi Rory, > >> regular CSS and background images. I now have 4 new divs, one for each >> corner image; each one has a little background image for the corners. >> So, that's working, but I wonder can anyone take a look at my revised >> code an

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

From: "Thierry Koblentz" > The four corner technique is great for flexible layouts, but since yours has > a fixed width I think you could do this with just two nested containers. One > contains the top image, the other the bottom image. > Create a sprite that has both these images next to each oth

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

At 12:29 PM -0400 4/21/10, Rory Bernstein wrote: >Thanks, Al. I've ditched all the CSS3 from the page, sticking to >regular CSS and background images. I now have 4 new divs, one for >each corner image; each one has a little background image for the >corners. So, that's working, but I wonder can

[css-d] Problem overriding background-image for li

Hello everyone: I trying to override background-image in this: #container ul li, #content .module ul li{ background:url(../images/marker_liink.gif) 0 5px no-repeat; /*This needs to be overridden*/ color:#6D5F52; line-height:16px; padding:4px 0 5px 25px; } With:

[css-d] How is width calculated in position absolute elements and width: 100%

Hi, I'm having a problem with an absolute positioned div with width = 100% that gets its width = 0 (both FF and Chrome). (It's inside a bit of divs and stuff like that, so it's a bit hard to debug) What I want to know is how is width calculated for absolute positioned elements and especially

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

> >Revised page is still here: > >http://rorybernstein.com/roundcorners/ > > That's to what I've done here: > > http://sperling.com/examples/box/ > > However, the div's are arranged differently. I believe the OP is looking for a technique that would allow him to use less markup, not more. That

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: a warning for Gmail users

That's the same story that was posted on Computerworld - the one that Eric linked to. Val On 21 April 2010 17:34, Peter Hammarling wrote: > relevant news story on Macworld > > http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?newsid=3221204 > > > Peter H. --- "S

Re: [css-d] How is width calculated in position absolute elements and width: 100%

lixoaqui wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm having a problem with an absolute positioned div with width = 100% that > gets its width = 0 (both FF and Chrome). (It's inside a bit of divs and stuff > like that, so it's a bit hard to debug) > > What I want to know is how is width calculated for absolute positio

[css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

Hi, http://s318194674.websitehome.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132&Itemid=1 I was trying to apply a white, 50% opaque, background colour to a wrapper via CSS and see what happened! I have no idea CSS could do something like that! It's tuned the whole lot into a ghost web

Re: [css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

> I just want to make a div with css applied to it to get a background > colour appear at 50%. Any ideas? What's happening is that everything has an opacity of 50%. You can't apply it to just the background, afaik, but you can fake it. Set the opacity to 50% on the parent, like you've got, and

Re: [css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

Hi Tim, > > I just want to make a div with css applied to it to get a background > > colour appear at 50%. Any ideas? > > What's happening is that everything has an opacity of 50%. You can't > apply it to just the background, afaik, but you can fake it. > Set the opacity to 50% on the parent, li

Re: [css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

On 22/04/2010, at 7:40 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: > Hi Tim, > >>> I just want to make a div with css applied to it to get a background >>> colour appear at 50%. Any ideas? >> >> What's happening is that everything has an opacity of 50%. You can't >> apply it to just the background, afaik, but y

Re: [css-d] Problem overriding background-image for li

Am 21.04.10 20:22, schrieb Kamil Saiyed: > Hello everyone: > I trying to override background-image in this: (code slightly condensed for legibility) > #container ul li, #content .module ul li{ > > background:url(../images/marker_liink.gif) 0 5px no-repeat; > /*This needs to be ov

Re: [css-d] Problem overriding background-image for li

That did it! Thanks for the great explanation too! Kamil Saiyed Rhapsody Solutions, LLC Application Developer 281 668 9177 Phone 713 595 6699 Fax kamil.sai...@rhapsodysolutions.net www.rhapsodysolutions.net -Original Message- From: Joergen W. Lang [mailto:joergen_l...@gmx.de] Sent: Wedn

Re: [css-d] rounded corners problem

So, same page: http://www.rorybernstein.com/roundcorners/ New problem: Layout is all messed up in IE7. Have not looked at 6 yet, but expect that is messed up too. Help? Thank you, Rory __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.or

Re: [css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> What's happening is that everything has an opacity of 50%. You can't >> apply it to just the background, afaik, but you can fake it. >> Set the opacity to 50% on the parent, like you've got, and then reset >> the opacity to 100% on all the

Re: [css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

On 4/21/10 12:07 PM, Chris Blake wrote: > Hi, > > http://s318194674.websitehome.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132&Itemid=1 > I was trying to apply a white, 50% opaque, background colour to a > wrapper via CSS and see what happened! I have no idea CSS could do > something like t

Re: [css-d] Unbelievable CSS Trick

ok, I'll join :) > http://s318194674.websitehome.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view= > a > rticle&id=132&Itemid=1 > > I was trying to apply a white, 50% opaque, background colour to a > > wrapper via CSS and see what happened! I have no idea CSS could do > > something like that! > > > [...]