David Laakso wrote( and sent back to the list):
Hello David.
Using ":7" causes a parsing error.
Who cares :-) ?
Not me. :-)
@import test-ie;
Upon checking your page I noticed that whole chunks of the media
queries are invalid. This one,
@media screen and (max-device-width: 480px),
> Please see sig link IE 6/7/8.
> #main p,:7 {color: lime; }
Thanks David :)
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailm
On 9/18/10 7:56 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
We could use this:
.left,.right,.maincontent,x:-ie7 {}
Actually, it is the colon that dos the magic.
For example:
selector,ie:7 {...}
or:
selector,:7 {...} /* even shorter to target ie7 :) */
--
Regards,
Thierry
Please see sig link IE 6/
> We could use this:
>
> .left,.right,.maincontent,x:-ie7 {}
Actually, it is the colon that dos the magic.
For example:
selector,ie:7 {...}
or:
selector,:7 {...} /* even shorter to target ie7 :) */
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz
_
On Saturday, September 18, 2010 1:03:37 pm David Laakso wrote:
> > The CSS *below* is now valid.
> > Validate the markup, too.
> > http://validator.w3.org/
> > If it is not working as intended with valid CSS and valid markup,
> > provide a clickable link to your URL.
> > Btw, I know from nothing a
Afternoon Lalena
You wrote;
Hi everyone,
I've tested my pages on Firefox and Safari and IE8, and all looks fine.
But when I check on my old version of IE, IE5.2 for Mac, I get red "X"
symbols in place of some image files whose names are too long.
I haven't figured out exactly what the maxi
Hi everyone,
I've tested my pages on Firefox and Safari and IE8, and all looks
fine. But when I check on my old version of IE, IE5.2 for Mac, I get
red "X" symbols in place of some image files whose names are too long.
I haven't figured out exactly what the maximum allowed number of
characte
On 9/18/10 12:45 PM, David Laakso wrote:
On 9/18/10 11:30 AM, Allen Bennett wrote:
It gives me an error because I didn't send it a fill--but I don't
know how
to; evidently I can't simply click on the URL you sent me.
Most lines center only in AM browser (a tabbed browser that "sits on
top
o
I think I found a new hack for IE7.
Instead of this:
*:first-child + html .left,
*:first-child + html .right,
*:first-child + html .maincontent {}
We could use this:
.left,.right,.maincontent,x:-ie7 {}
Because of "x:-ie7" other browsers should drop the entire rule. Note that
this is a "variati
On 9/18/10 10:45 AM, Rob Emenecker wrote:
Checked on a local file only...
*:first-child + html .left,
*:first-child + html .right,
*:first-child + html .maincontent {
z-index: -1; background: lime; }
/* for IE/7.0 */
That did work, however when I tried applying the same treatment to the DIV
co
> Checked on a local file only...
>
> *:first-child + html .left,
> *:first-child + html .right,
> *:first-child + html .maincontent {
> z-index: -1; background: lime; }
> /* for IE/7.0 */
That did work, however when I tried applying the same treatment to the DIV
containing the breadcrumbs -- bet
On 9/17/10 11:54 PM, Allen Bennett wrote:
Most lines center only in AM browser (a tabbed browser that "sits on top of"
IE-so I assume that it works properly in IE, also). Also, it gives a
malware warning when I try to open it in Google Chrome (only). The CSS is
below.
Allen J. Bennett
> > Can anyone shed any light as to why the z-index is not behaving as
> > desired/expected on IE7? The suckerfish menu is falling
> behind my content.
> > (Or my content is appearing on top.) Either case, it's not
> consistent
> > with the correct behavior that I am seeing in IE8 and FF3.
>
>
I was shocked!!! 10 pounds have lost! And it’s only beginning. Join me:
http://nzsmith.com/net.php
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://cs
14 matches
Mail list logo
