On 2010/10/20 17:04 (GMT-0700) Corona Rivera composed:
> Would someone please explain why EM is usually used for the width property
> instead of Pixels?
> I'm inclined to use pixels since that's the monitor's unit of measurement but
> Adobe and most CSS examples I see use the M. - How come?
A
On 10/20/10 8:04 PM, Corona Rivera wrote:
Would someone please explain why EM is usually used for the width property
instead of Pixels?
Perhaps because they never experimented with advantages of employing px,
em, and percent widths within the same layout :-) ?
Best,
Dr Lakra
Oaxaca, M
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Corona Rivera
wrote:
> Would someone please explain why EM is usually used for the width property
> instead of Pixels?
>
> I'm inclined to use pixels since that's the monitor's unit of measurement but
> Adobe and most CSS examples I see use the M. - How come?
>
>
Would someone please explain why EM is usually used for the width property
instead of Pixels?
I'm inclined to use pixels since that's the monitor's unit of measurement but
Adobe and most CSS examples I see use the M. - How come?
Thanks,
Corona
__
On 10/19/10 11:32 PM, Carol Swinehart wrote:
http://www.tishstreasures.biz/store
The transparent white background is only covering the footer but has
been applieed to the main content.
Thanks for any help.
C
Your note is a little cryptic and I am not sure what you mean as there
is no
I found a solution, but it is not very elegant.
First I updated the css by changing the margin declaration for the
element. Second I added a class of .left and applied it in the
HTML to the two elements I wanted to place well ... on the left.
Here is the .css snippet :
article {
height: auto;
Hi,
I am having a problem with a floated element in IE6. Big surprise :o)
I have read many posts here as well as many of articles on the subject,
including this very recent one: http://bit.ly/clrfxReloaded , and have
tried , in vain, to apply what I thought I learned to my problem.
The page i
