Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

On 22/12/2010 11:20 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: We now have all implementations supporting all the CSS3 properties that I demo'd . I would please appreciate a check in FF4 beta if anyone has it. As far as the CSS 3 backgrounds and borders

Re: [css-d] safari glitch

> http://ba-doyn.com/junk/ There was some deprecated html like the center tag and align=right etc. and some non-semantic html like . I've made an example of how you can style the form with valid css and semantic html. http://roughtech.com/t/j.html ~Chetan

Re: [css-d] Footer on odd pages only

David Hucklesby wrote: On 12/20/10 3:40 PM, Evan Panagiotopoulos wrote: I create a string of html documents using php. Each document prints one sheet of paper. I would like to have the documents that form the odd sheets to have a footer where the even documents to have none. [...] How do you d

Re: [css-d] help with div fixed when resizing window [ec]

thanks! On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:59 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Whoops! Error Correction; > > The link to the referenced layout is: > > > Best, > ~d > > http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ > > __

Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

At 13:28 +0100 on 12/20/2010, Gabriele Romanato wrote about [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation: In response to the criticisms moved against my CSS template #1, here's my point of view on that matter: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-vendor-prefixes-and-validation.html Part of th

Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

On Dec 22, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > We now have all implementations supporting all the CSS3 properties that I > demo'd . I would please appreciate a check in FF4 beta if anyone has it. As far as the CSS 3 backgrounds and borders module is concerned, Gecko 2.0 (Fx 4b), Presto (Op

Re: [css-d] safari glitch

On 12/21/10 10:12 AM, Michael Beaudoin wrote: Hi all, I am working on a simple form that was developed by another, that when loaded into Safari, it will either not line up or when you click on a drop down menu it will become misaligned. A refresh will bring it back into alignment. It looks and

Re: [css-d] CSS Coding Style

I used to use multiple stylesheets for ease of development (and I have to admit, often a lot more than the four you're using), but in recent years, after reading about the impact on page load speed, my approach has changed radically. If you're using @import, as you will be if you're using one styl

Re: [css-d] Footer on odd pages only

On 12/20/10 3:40 PM, Evan Panagiotopoulos wrote: I create a string of html documents using php. Each document prints one sheet of paper. I would like to have the documents that form the odd sheets to have a footer where the even documents to have none. [...] How do you do that? Unless you are d

[css-d] safari glitch

Hi all, I am working on a simple form that was developed by another, that when loaded into Safari, it will either not line up or when you click on a drop down menu it will become misaligned. A refresh will bring it back into alignment. It looks and works fine in IE and Firefox. The sampl

Re: [css-d] How do I style links which are only a part of ul li?

Thank you, Tim and others who answered! Problem solved, now I know how what to do. Appreciate your help. -- Ellen On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:47 -0500, "Tim Arnold" wrote: .longlinelist a {color: #0f0;} will make links inside your list green. You could also just do: li a{color: #0f0;} if

Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

Alan Gresley wrote: It's time now to drop the prefixes. Now if you wish to debate this, then please feel most welcome to subscribe to the CSS WG list. Not that you will stop anything. How are those not involved in the current discussion intended to interpret that last sentence, Alan ? Are w

Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

On 22/12/2010 2:11 AM, Barney Carroll wrote: CC to list since this is worthy of list discussion. Alan, Vendor prefixes are traditionally used to implement proprietary or experimental features. Yes, I acknowledge that but this transitional approach has held back web designers and developers

Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

Alan Gresley wrote: I should add that the CSS WG current work page is out of date often. The current work with the latest drafts are found here. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/ It's not the release of a new editor's draft that's significant, it's the spec moving to Candidate Recommendation which sho

Re: [css-d] Vendor prefixes and validation

On 21/12/2010 11:30 AM, Rob Crowther wrote: On 21/12/10 00:07, Alan Gresley wrote: Alan Gresley wrote: Currently IE9 beta supports most of CSS3 without any vender prefixes. All of which do no need a -ms- prefix. That's 1

Re: [css-d] image gallery question

On 12/20/10 5:04 PM, Matthew P. Johnson wrote: I am also looking for a better image gallery but the thing I do like about this gallery is that all I have to do to add images is resize the larger image and add a line of code and I am done so it works well for regular edits without having to run the