I'm having a problem with a web page's display in IE 8.
Here's a quick link I set up to show you how the page looks in IE8 and how it
should look: http://americanart.si.edu/test2
I don't know where to begin with this one.
You can see the real page at http://africanamericanart.si.edu/timeline
On 25/03/2011 2:47 AM, Gates, Jeff wrote:
I'm having a problem with a web page's display in IE 8.
Here's a quick link I set up to show you how the page looks in IE8
and how it should look: http://americanart.si.edu/test2
I don't know where to begin with this one.
You can see the real page at
On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks.htm
I have uploaded another test.
IE8 and IE9 see this.
p [background: blue}
.test1 {background: green}
.test2 {background: green}
And all other browsers see this,
p
Hello CSS Discuss,
I am really stumped by why there are some slight differences when viewing my
work locally and then online, since I am using the same exact CSS and the same
browser. Unfortunately, I can not provide a URL to the page because it is
proprietary and I have signed an NDA.
On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks.htm
I will try this again but this time with the link to the new test.
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks2.htm
IE8 and IE9 see this.
p [background: blue}
.test1
Thanks for your reply. No I have not tried comparing the markup in winMerge, is
that for windows only? I am on a Mac. I am using Dreamweaver and that is what I
use to save my files. I have been working on several pages of the site for the
past few weeks and this is the first time I am running
Install Firebug and then inspect the CSS that is applied to the
elements in question.
Regards,
Chetan Crasta
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Wait, are you comparing the preview in Dreamweaver to what you see in a
browser? I don't use Dreamweaver, but IIRC the appearance of the preview
should be taken with a grain of salt, and to look at the page in whatever
browsers you are planning to support.
Kevin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:45
Yes I already use Firebug and have been for several years now. :) The issue
doesn't seem to be that the CSS is different. Something else is going on.
Elli
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Chetan Crasta chetancra...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chetan Crasta chetancra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [css-d] Same
No. I only hand code in Dreamweaver so I don't use their design view. I am
viewing the files via FF, through a local mamp web server. And then I view the
files again, in the same browser, FF but on the web server on the domain name
of the site. and that is where the discrepancy shows up.
Elli
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello CSS Discuss,
I am really stumped by why there are some slight differences when viewing my
work locally and then online, since I am using the same exact CSS and the
same browser. Unfortunately, I can not provide a
The BEST browser to review your work in is the SAME browser (and O/S) that
your client sits in front of every day.
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Elli Vizcaino
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:56
I'm running some browser-specific stacking issues with Flash objects on two
different pages:
1. In Chrome (Mac Win) and IE 7 8, the css drop-downs on the left of
this page fall behind the flash MP3 player in the left column. Seems like
this would be a stacking issue but can't pin it down.
On 3/23/11 5:28 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
On this page:
http://motherloadshow.com/
There is a div called id=bulletin_board that should display an image of
papers pinned to a cork board ...
Thanks, Rory
Philip Taylor kindly sent me this screenshot showing how the bulletin board
content
Hi - I just started a website redesign for a new client. I did a quick
initial layout in her old table-based format and the css navigation worked
fine. I've now changed it over to div's and while part of the css is working
OK, the navigation drop downs and hovers quit working. My brain is mush
On 3/24/11 2:18 PM, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote:
On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks.htm
I will try this again but this time with the link to the new test.
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks2.htm
IE8
- Try floating the img left, and add something to clear the parent div.
- Or putting the cork board before the image, which seems contrary to normal
flow, but with the cork board floated right, the img shouldn't bump down.
Kevin
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Rory Bernstein
On 25/03/2011 7:35 AM, Gates, Jeff wrote:
On 3/24/11 2:18 PM, Alan Gresleya...@css-class.com wrote:
On 25/03/2011 4:00 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks.htm
I will try this again but this time with the link to the new test.
First clear all cache files from your system; Then if this doesn't solve,
then try loading the files from your desktop to your server using the ftp
client. DON'T USE DREAMWEAVER'S FTP FACILITY; It is likely that
dreamweaver is not loading the changed files.
I have seen these things happen
In my opinion this could have a bunch of causes.
Did you load the local files with file://... or do you have a server
running locally and go through localhost?
Might the remote server have a OS running that uses case sensitive file
names, whiule your local OS does not? Maybe when viewed
Thanks John and Christian for your suggestions. I will give them both a try
tomorrow and follow up wth an update.
@ Christian, I use Mamp and it's a localhost that points to the name of the
site on my hard drive. So for example it would be: nameofdirectory:/me.html
and all images do show,
Is there any reason to specify an image's height and width on the img tag
rather than (or in addition to) specifying in the CSS? Could specifying the
width and height only in the CSS be a reason that an image might load more
slowly (in modern browsers)?
Thanks,
Sara
On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Alan Gresley wrote:
http://css-class.com/test/css/parsing/invalid-blocks2.htm
IE8 and IE9 see this.
p [background: blue}
.test1 {background: green}
.test2 {background: green}
And all other browsers see this,
p [background: blue}]
Is there any reason to specify an image's height and width on the
img tag rather than (or in addition to) specifying in the CSS?
Setting and image's width and height in the HTML code, reserves the
space for that element before image gets loaded. I don't think there is
any other advantage,
Mac OS 10.4.11
FF/3.6.15 puts a space beneath the buttons in the fuchsia nav block.
Safari/4.1.3 does not.
What to do, if anything?
HTML
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
CSS
Line Number 1-11:
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/css/sisu.css
Best,
~d
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
On Mar 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Laakso wrote:
FF/3.6.15 puts a space beneath the buttons in the fuchsia nav block.
Safari/4.1.3 does not.
What to do, if anything?
HTML
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
why the overflow: hidden in
nav li a, nav ul li b ?
remove it and you'll have the
On 3/24/11 10:45 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
FF/3.6.15 puts a space beneath the buttons in the fuchsia nav block.
Safari/4.1.3 does not.
What to do, if anything?
HTML
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
why the overflow: hidden in
nav li a, nav ul li b ?
remove it and you'll have the same
27 matches
Mail list logo
