Re: [css-d] 5

2011-04-27 Thread John Franks
It will help you to keep good form!... http://xn--krutersachse-hcb.de/friends_links.php?veqSID=88i5 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

[css-d] Selecting list archives by month is broken

2011-04-27 Thread Alan Gresley
Hello Eric, I was searching the list archives for an old thread but I wanted to see the initial message of the thread. I couldn't find it so instead I thought I would just select the month from the options and work from the beginning of the month to the end of the month. I discovered that

Re: [css-d] Selecting list archives by month is broken

2011-04-27 Thread Alan Gresley
On 27/04/2011 4:27 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: Hello Eric, I was searching the list archives Apologies to the list. This was meant to be sent offlist to the list chaperon (I selected to wrong email) to report an error in the public list archives. -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread G.Sørtun
On 27.04.2011 05:17, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: http://dev.l-c-n.com/CSS3/transform_scale_min-font-size.html I have a minimum font-size set to 12px in all browsers, in Opera 11.10, Gecko 1.9.2 and Safari 5 / WebKit / Chrome, the text in the lower box is half that size. Interesting. Gets

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Apr 27, 2011, at 5:09 PM, G.Sørtun wrote: Dunno about IE 9. Nothing yet, AFAICT :-) IE's Ignore font size isn't the same as minimum font size though, so it will be interesting to see how IE will handle transform. Ok - I am confused. IE 9 is supposed to support CSS3 2D transforms

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:04 AM, upa...@earthlink.net upa...@earthlink.net wrote: I messed Up on that second work around. Below is the Corrected one noindex:-o-prefocus, yourselector{              rules              rules } Thanks for that. I used that special selector to restrict the

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread Alan Gresley
On 27/04/2011 7:01 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Apr 27, 2011, at 5:09 PM, G.Sørtun wrote: Dunno about IE 9. Nothing yet, AFAICT :-) IE's Ignore font size isn't the same as minimum font size though, so it will be interesting to see how IE will handle transform. Quite well. Ok -

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Alan Gresley a...@css-class.com wrote: Is Chetan freezing font-sizes again? You have more chance of consistency by using an image. The problem wasn't Opera's 9px minimum font size per se, but the height increase that it resulted in. Restricting the height

[css-d] min-width and min-height ignored on resizable elements

2011-04-27 Thread Jarek Foksa
Let's say we have following code: div id=box/div #box { resize: both; overflow: auto; background: #ccc; width: 500px; height: 500px; min-width: 100px; min-height: 100px; } It turns out that specified min-height and min-width values are completely ignored and instead min-width is

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread G.Sørtun
On 27.04.2011 11:01, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Updated the test case. Reports please ? IE9 transforms, and scale by 16px when using accessibility setting. Georg __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] min-width and min-height ignored on resizable elements

2011-04-27 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Jarek Foksa wrote: div id=box/div #box { resize: both; overflow: auto; background: #ccc; width: 500px; height: 500px; min-width: 100px; min-height: 100px; } It turns out that specified min-height and min-width values are completely ignored and

Re: [css-d] Incorrect width - Opera Bug?

2011-04-27 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: Ok - I am confused. IE 9 is supposed to support CSS3 2D transforms http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/ie/ff468705.aspx#_CSS3_2D_Transforms Oh, hold on, I didn't put the -ms- prefixed one. My bad. Updated the test case. Reports please ?

[css-d] IE6, 7 and overflow on a slider: is there a fix?

2011-04-27 Thread Gabriele Romanato
Hi, I've been quite busy with a new client recently due to a vertical content slider that doesn't work in IE6 and 7. The markup structure is: div id=slider div id=slider-wrapper div class=slide.../div !--more slides-- /div /div The CSS: #slider { width: 400px;

Re: [css-d] IE6, 7 and overflow on a slider: is there a fix?

2011-04-27 Thread David Laakso
On 4/27/11 12:49 PM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi, I've been quite busy with a new client recently due to a vertical content slider that doesn't work in IE6 and 7. The markup structure is: #slider { width: 400px; height: 300px; overflow: hidden; } Gabriele Romanato Best bet

Re: [css-d] min-width and min-height ignored on resizable elements

2011-04-27 Thread Jarek Foksa
But then you specify the resize property. I'm not sure what should happen in this case. Gecko 2.0+ allow resizing downwards, until the minimum size is reached. Webkit doesn't allow resizing. I have just tried Firefox 4 and indeed it works as expected there. So this seems to be Webkit-specific

Re: [css-d] IE6, 7 and overflow on a slider: is there a fix?

2011-04-27 Thread Chetan Crasta
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Gabriele Romanato gabriele.roman...@gmail.com wrote: Now, IE6 and 7 show _all_ the slides, while IE8 and all other browsers (correctly) only the very first one. Is there a fix or something? I noticed this behavior occurring also for horizontal sliders. We