Sorry about the double posting. I don't know how it happened. I
thought I had clicked send already, and apparently I had, but the
window didn't go away like it should have.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Laakso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, David Thorp
> wrote:
> Just to clarify, what I mean is, as soon as I add
> "resize:horizontal;" to the div.sidebar {}, it breaks.
>
> --
> It is a little difficult to help because you seem a little confused
>
Sounds like I'm jumping in on this a little late, as Vince has chimed in for me
(thanks), but yes, David, thanks for the suggestions and I can see some merits
in CSS tables in certain circumstances (very interesting idea, really), but in
this case, I couldn't see how it's going to work, and it l
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:41 AM, David Laakso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, David Thorp
> wrote:
> Just to clarify, what I mean is, as soon as I add
> "resize:horizontal;" to the div.sidebar {}, it breaks.
>
> --
> It is a little difficult to help because you seem a little confused
>
At 03:47 PM 3/11/2012, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Tedd Sperling wrote:
All new technical terminology starts as some form of jargon. The
success of which usually comes about as an acceptance of term
definitions among those practicing the technology.
As a result of which we now have to suffer such a
On 3/11/2012 4:53 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
http://www.keithpurtell.com/kthings/if.htm
So, that is the typical Twitter packet - it generates a truck load of divs and
loads contents via ajax calls. If you look at the source of that page, you see
a js string that sets the width of one of
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, David Thorp
wrote:
Just to clarify, what I mean is, as soon as I add
"resize:horizontal;" to the div.sidebar {}, it breaks.
--
It is a little difficult to help because you seem a little confused
about CSS ["look and feel] versus scripting/programming .
Neverthel
Tedd Sperling wrote:
All new technical terminology starts as some form of jargon. The success of
which usually comes about as an acceptance of term definitions among those
practicing the technology.
As a result of which we now have to suffer such abominations
as "distro" (distribution), "g
On Mar 11, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Ghodmode wrote:
>
> Anyway, the specific meaning of the individual terms wasn't the point. In
> fact,
> I just made up at least one of them. The point was that we create catchy
> names
> for our ideas, techniques, and technologies and that they don't necessarily
>
On Mar 11, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Keith Purtell wrote:
> Here's a temporary link to their code. I'll take a look at the w3 link while
> anyone who cares to can comment on the following: It's supposed to fit inside
> a tall slender area, and the publisher wants the full text width visible via
> diff
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Keith Purtell
wrote:
> On 3/10/2012 9:11 AM, Ghodmode wrote:
>>
>> It's not really a CSS question, but a basic HTML question. Iframes have a
>> "scrolling" property that defines whether or not the iframe should have
>> scroll bars...
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/htm
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Ghodmode wrote:
>> In this field, we live on a never-ending stream of meaningless phrases. Here
>> are a few more examples:
>> Dynamic HTML
>> Object Oriented Programming
>> Web 2.0
>> AJAX
>> Semantic Web
12 matches
Mail list logo
